Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Feb 2011

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DyceBot (talk | contribs) at 07:01, 9 February 2011 (Archiving 0 stale sections and 2 resolved sections.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Stale

Resolved

Watermark for removal

  Resolved

Article(s): South African Class 11 2-8-2

Request: Please remove watermark. Couldn't just crop it off since it would take away part of the loco chimney as well André Kritzinger 14:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by Smalljim.   Done  —SMALLJIM  14:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff, as usual, thanks! (Was going to also ask if my hand, at top left corner to get shade on the lens, could be removed but I didn't want to push my luck....) André Kritzinger 21:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Can't say I spotted that, actually, but I've cloned it out by assuming that what's next to it continues unchanged to the edge. It looks reasonable to me, but if it's not acceptable please feel free to revert.  —SMALLJIM  10:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! You're a wizard! André Kritzinger 11:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

fix perspective

  Resolved

Article(s): Ignaz Bösendorfer, Bösendorfer

Request: Please fix perspective. Remove reflection on frame. Sharpen whenever possible (especially the 2nd one). And improve on the color and brightness, especially the third one... Gryffindor (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Request taken by PawełMM.

  Done: Done as requested, but frames reflection intentionally reduced only. PawełMM (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine too, thank you for your work. --Gryffindor (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Digestive biscuit

  Resolved

Article(s): Digestive biscuit

Request: cut away brown background for contrast... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quesadilla

  Resolved

Article(s): Quesadilla

Request: trim top to encyclopedic... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Done - Fallschirmjäger  12:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Bouilhet

  Resolved

Article(s): Christofle

Request: Please fix perspective... Gryffindor (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, maybe I'm imagining, but I still get the impression that the perspective is from above, the lower parts of the plaque looks smaller than they should be. Also the top of his head looks huge compared to the rest of his face...? Gryffindor (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize, but according to my opinion all is well. The proportions of image are correct. The dimensions of sides top-bottom and right-left are even. The head of person is written in circle. PawełMM (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok in that case thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deinosuchus

  Resolved

Article(s): Deinosuchus

Request: Remove the stripes. Vearthy (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done. Quibik (talk) 22:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Vearthy (talk) 02:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquim Nabuco and Princess Maria Amélia of Brazil

  Resolved

Article(s): Joaquim Nabuco and Princess Maria Amélia of Brazil

Request: Clean and improve somehow Joaquim Nabuco's photo, please. I'd like to see the signature's background removed and translucid. Perhaps, if possible, the signature should be darkened, since its quaility isn't that great and it will quite hard to visualize it correctly. Thank you very much, Lecen (talk) 02:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Request taken by PawełMM.

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 11:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pawel, thank you very much for helping me out. However, I'd like to request you these: could Joaquim Nabuco's photo be more sharpen? Also, could you make the background in the signature transparent? Thank you again, --Lecen (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  Redone: Redone as you requested. The first one file was sharpened a little, but I could'n do more, becouse of very bad source file. PawełMM (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot, PawełMM. You were great! --Lecen (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the German Eagle

  Resolved

Article(s): Order of the German Eagle

Request: remove black background... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Splendid, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Pierce

  Resolved

Article(s): Franklin Pierce

Request: Make background transparent. Keep shading in the background (make it partially transparent). 97.112.158.64 (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chimay

  Resolved

Article(s): Chimay

Request: lighten or remove dark background for contrast... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic, thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gustav Otto

  Resolved

Article(s): Gustav Otto

Request: Requesting that border and watermark be removed. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by Smalljim.   Done: also took the opportunity to clean it up a bit - hope it's OK.  —SMALLJIM  17:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great - thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chapbook

  Resolved

Article(s): Chapbook

Request: flatten out folds... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Request taken by PawełMM.

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 16:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, great, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the Chrysanthemum

  Resolved

Article(s): Order of the Chrysanthemum

Request: remove background... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful, thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Zeman

  Resolved

Article(s): Allan Zeman

Request: Create a new image named Allan Zeman.jpg from this one, cropping out the background to focus on Zeman. Quigley (talk) 21:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Quigley (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Blackie"

  Resolved

Article(s): South African "Blackie" 0-4-2WT

Request: Please remove the embedded text, if possible
André Kritzinger 02:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 11:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank you! André Kritzinger 13:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Mir node interior

  Resolved

Article(s): Mir

Request: Watermark removal Hi folks! I've got this image of the interior of Mir, which was taken on STS-84 and as such is a NASA public ___domain image. Unfortunately, as NASA isn't exactly hot at updating its pages about old missions, it's not very high-res. There's a higher-res version of this on the Life website here, but unfortunately it's got a watermark on it (it's printed in Hall, R. editor. The History of Mir 1986-2000. London: British Interplanetary Society; 2000 without the watermark). If someone could please download a copy of the Life image, remove the watermark and upload it over the lower res image, I'd be very grateful. Thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done Removed the watermark and uploaded it as a new image (besides being higher-resolution, I don't find the Life image to be that much better). —Quibik (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much - why didn't you just upload it over the old image, though? :-S Colds7ream (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for not adhering to your request. IMHO the Life version, while being higher-resolution, is somewhat blurry and not that much clearer. Also, its color balance and contrast look much weaker to me. So I would use the NASA version in an article (where it is downscaled anyway), but keep the Life version as a larger alternative. —Quibik (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough! Thanks again for sorting this out! :-) Colds7ream (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FYI I have a tool for automatically removing the LIFE watermark with little to no damage - contact me if you ever need this. Dcoetzee 03:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request photoshop sand over left and right lizards

  Resolved

Article(s): state reptile

Request: The middle lizard is the correct species. Left and right are wrong. Want to hide the wrong species. I think photoshop sand over them. Since it needs to go into a table list, cropping would lead to too bizarre of an aspect ratio that would make photo too long. P.s. There is a scary looking copyright tag, but FN looked at it and said it was CC-by-SA. TCO (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Done. Regards, Fallschirmjäger  18:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, man. We want you on speed-dial. Great to have these capabilities around and to acessess the help. Not have to learn every single thing by one person. I saw htat you are good maps as well. Very enticing!TCO (talk) 05:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome work here. It's perfect.  :-) NYMFan69-86 (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, anytime :) Fallschirmjäger  15:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Stockwell

  Resolved

Article(s): Dean Stockwell

Request: tone down the orangey... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 07:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]