Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

publication of questionable notability, article created by blatantly COI account. WuhWuzDat 18:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment COI is not a reason for deletion. Any other arguments/evidence? --Crusio (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability does not appear to be asserted. Impact factors quoted place the publication half way, or less than halfway, up the scale in comparison to related publications. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously: included in JCR with very decent impact factor. --Crusio (talk) 23:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Inclusion in ISI's JCR is an indication of its being a solid technical journal. --Orlady (talk) 19:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per above. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 13:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Scholarly journal. Fotaun (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't agree with Wikipedia:Scholarly journal but this is good enough according to Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals). —David Eppstein (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]