The Forer effect is an effect based on self-validation of personality descriptions, where an individual gives a high rating of a description as applying to themselves, when in fact it is not specific. It provides an apparent explantion as to why many people accept some pseudosciences, such as astrology, graphology and fortune telling.
In 1948, psychologist B.R. Forer gave a personality test to his students, and then gave them a personal analysis. He invited eash of them to rate the result on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) as it applied to themselves: the average was 4.26. He then revealed that each student had been given the same analysis, and their responses to the test had been ignored.
The analysis given was:
- "You have a need for other people to like and admire you, and yet you tend to be critical of yourself. While you have some personality weaknesses you are generally able to compensate for them. You have considerable unused capacity that you have not turned to your advantage. Disciplined and self-controlled on the outside, you tend to be worrisome and insecure on the inside. At times you have serious doubts as to whether you have made the right decision or done the right thing. You prefer a certain amount of change and variety and become dissatisfied when hemmed in by restrictions and limitations. You also pride yourself as an independent thinker; and do not accept others' statements without satisfactory proof. But you have found it unwise to be too frank in revealing yourself to others. At times you are extroverted, affable, and sociable, while at other times you are introverted, wary, and reserved. Some of your aspirations tend to be rather unrealistic."