Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Msnicki (talk | contribs) at 18:47, 10 July 2011 (→Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual

Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure wether this is an ad or the manual itself but it is ridiculously spammy and should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a webspace provider. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete perhaps if the book itself is willing to be open-sourced, it could be moved to WikiBooks? The author Pete Herzog also looks like a living person bio that should also go, with no independent reliable sources. W Nowicki (talk) 17:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No reliable independent sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Certainly, lots of Google hits, but nothing I could find that could be used as a source for notability. This article appears to be WP:PROMOTION. I agree with W Nowicki that the associated Pete Herzog should also be deleted, also for lack of sources to establish notability. Msnicki (talk) 18:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Open_Source_Security_Testing_Methodology_Manual&oldid=438783454"