Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tothwolf/Expand testcases
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TenPoundHammer (talk | contribs) at 17:35, 24 October 2011 (→User:Tothwolf/Expand testcases: close). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 17:35, 24 October 2011 by TenPoundHammer (talk | contribs) (→User:Tothwolf/Expand testcases: close)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Never mind Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sandbox testing a now deprecated template. No longer needed, user semi retired. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not retired nor am I semi-retired. I kept the test cases I wrote last December because I often reuse test cases and other template code. Why didn't you bother asking me before you MfD'd something from my userspace? Better yet, why not check my archives? Why do you still have this obsession with {{Expand}} and its deletion? I'm trying to be nice, TenPoundHammer, but you sure don't make it easy... --Tothwolf (talk) 04:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I also have User:Tothwolf/Expand sandbox in my userspace for the very same reason; I often reuse template code that I've written. With {{Expand}} originally having been hard deleted, if I didn't preserve these in my userspace, I couldn't go back and reuse code from them. Would you prefer I move these two pages back to subpages of {{Expand}} now that we've switched it to soft deletion (done to avoid errors with old page revisions) with {{Deleted template}} (which I also did work on)? This MFD is silly. --Tothwolf (talk) 04:45, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep useful content without the danger of being seen as a fake article; it can stay there unto perpetuity without harming anyone. JORGENEVSKI 05:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.