Talk:Architecture tradeoff analysis method

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Systems: Enterprise modelling Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Enterprise modelling.

Notability

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is this method used in any place outside of the book? Is there a third party using it, outside the author of the book and the Software Engineering Institute at the Carnegie Mellon University ? From my googling it seems that no. Jgc2003 (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

ATAM Used by Many Organizations

From my research there are many people using the ATAM process or variations of it. I am currently using this process for the US Library of Congress NDIIPP project. --Dan 20:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I am attending a Enterprise Data conference (Enterprise Data World) and ATAM is a recognized method for looking at architecture tradeoffs. See the presentation by Malcolm Chisholm --Dan 20:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)