Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop/Archive/Jan 2012

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DyceBot (talk | contribs) at 07:00, 3 January 2012 (Archiving 0 stale sections and 1 resolved section.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Stale

Logo of Company

 
TRAI logo
 
Planning Commission
 
ICAI

Article(s): Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Planning Commission (India), Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,

Request: Vectorize.--Kkm010* ۩ ۞ 17:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at these logos.--Kkm010* ۩ ۞ 04:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

Resolved

Logo of Companies

  Resolved
 
Maxis Communications
 
Saudi Telecom
 
SK Telecom
 
KDDI Corp
 
KT Corp
 
Hinduja Group
 
China Telecom
 
China Mobile
 
Axiata

 
Maxis Communications   Done
 
Saudi Telecom   Done
 
SK Telecom   Done
 
KDDI Corp   Done
 
KT Corp   Done
 
Hinduja Group   Done
 
China Telecom   Done
 
China Mobile   Done
 
Axiata   Done

Article(s): Maxis Communications, Saudi Telecom Company, SK Telecom, KDDI Corporation, KT (telecommunication company), Hinduja Group, China Telecom, China Mobile, Axiata

Request: Vectorize.--Kkm010* ۩ ۞ 12:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

Please, use GLNF for nonfree images. --Sn1pe! (talk) 21:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Two done. --Sn1pe! (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Another. --Sn1pe! (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Will look through PDFs shortly... – Connormah (talk) 20:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
China Telecom done. – Connormah (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
KT, SK and Hinduja all done and inserted into their respective articles. – Connormah (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Saudi Telecom and Axiata is still left out.--Kkm010* ۩ ۞ 04:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Axiata done. --Sn1pe! (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Saudi done, except for the annoying whitespace. Can someone fix that? They seem to be part of the strange array of shapes that make up the blur thing. --Sn1pe! (talk) 02:40, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you're referring to - the Saudi SVG looks good to me? Jon C (talk) 06:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improve value chain diagram

  Resolved
 – Fallschirmjäger 
 
 
Major uses of fluorine and the sources and conversion pathways. Applications involving fluorine gas are shown in yellow. SVG

Article(s): Fluorine, (currently in User:TCO/Sandbox/Working: Fluorine)

Request: Please

  • SVG
  • also make subscripts for the WF6, ReF6, and NF3 numbers.
  • Crisp up the text.
  • Make the yellow=#FFFF99
  • Anything else to pretty it up.

I will display it at 700px centered in article and want it readable. Feel free to play with the boxes or colors (but keep yellow for the fluorine, it's a theme). Also, there is a logic for which boxes are above which (major uses higher).

I would like to work it up for a Featured Picture try (they are sympathetic if there is significant research, not just prettiness, anyhow...let's try (you get the star too!)

TCO (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.s. I made this in PowerPoint and saved as a png. Can give you original if that helps. -TCO

Graphist opinion(s):   Request taken by Fallschirmjäger. 01:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok, here you go. Any further adjustments or typos etc just let me know. Regards, Fallschirmjäger  23:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks sweet. Love the blue!TCO (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aluminum refining diagram

  Resolved

Article(s): Aluminum, Cryolite, Fluorine several more

Request:

1. Make English language copy of entire drawing as is (this is for the smelting articles)

2. Make a simplified drawing (want to emphasise the cryolite and de-emphasize the details of Al production

  • Cut ALL the text except "cryolite-aluminum oxide melt" and "liquid aluminum"
  • Fix the break in the graphite electrodes

TCO (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): I hope that's what you were after. If my translation is strange, I apologise. I was relying on GCSE Chemistry. NikNaks talk - gallery 13:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you miss flussiges? :-) (I think it might be "molten" but check that - my German is as good as my Venusian :))
edit - just noticed above comments - maybe "liquid" Begoontalk 14:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Liquid" is good for flussiges.

For the simplified one, please add the words about the cryolite-aluminum oxide...and about the liquid aluminum.TCO (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I... sorry about that. xD How are these? NikNaks talk - gallery 15:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Thanks. You guys are the best! TCO (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Sorry, just noticed). Cryolite should not be capitalized in either English language version. I would also like the T=950C taken out of the simplified version.TCO (Reviews needed) 01:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  Altered - Begoontalk 04:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Done.TCO (Reviews needed) 04:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement for Gravitational potential animation

  Resolved
 – Jon C (talk)

Article(s): Gravitational field, Gravitational potential, Gravity well, Potential energy

Request: As pointed out in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#File:Gravitational potential.gif this animation has severe problems (from the physical point of view). So would it be possible to re-create a similar but correct animation or alternatively edit/change this one to become correct? If this is not possible, I will have to remove/delete the animation from the mentioned pages... Thanks and greetings --DrTrigon (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oo-kay... since this request seams not to be of any interest to you - I corrected the most problematic things by myself and uploaded the new animation to commons. In fact the file size is smaller and it has become more easy to modify now... ;) But it would be a really good and cool thing if someone could have a look at it, since I am not a wikigraphists... :) Thanks and greetings --DrTrigon (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Hi DrTrigon - I'm not sure if it's not of interest, or just a skill-set mismatch. Many of us "wikigraphists" (and certainly speaking for myself) are primarily vector illustrators, and an animation like this is just not something we have the skills to handle. Sorry. Jon C (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know if I do have those skills... ;) I just started up GIMP and enjoyed... :) Anyway I think this can be considered as done now - or what do you think? Greetings --DrTrigon (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If the original requester (you!) say so, then it's closed case! Jon C (talk) 09:37, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PTFE in coax cable

  Resolved

Article(s): Fluorine (will go in there)

Request: Change "Dielectric insulator" to be "PTFE dielectric" (make new file name as this pic is already used elsewhere). TCO (Reviews needed) 04:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   File:Coaxial cable cutaway PTFE.svg - Begoontalk 05:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is a great part of the project.TCO (Reviews needed) 05:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genealogy of the kings of Israel and Judah.svg

  Resolved
 – Jon C (talk)

Article(s): Kings of Judah, Kings of Israel, Kings of Israel and Judah family tree

Request: Hello, recently I requested this image (which was .png) be vectorised which Jkwchui did an incredible job on. There are just a few minor errors I was hoping someone might fix. In the title, king should be kings and if you could move the second line of the title a little to left so that it's directly under the first. Sorry if these small changes didn't merit a full request, thanks. Magister Scientatalk 17:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Done Jon C (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Magister Scientatalk 03:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]