Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Jan 2012
Stale
Resolved
Shylock
Article(s): Shylock
Request: rotate... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done: JBarta (talk) 06:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Tonga
Article(s): Sālote Tupou III, Coronations in Oceania, Tāufaʻāhau Tupou IV, James Egan Moulton
Request: Clean up the first image and make the second image less blurry. And clear up and brigthen the third image a little and also remove the tiny watermark on the bottom right corner; it's a google book label. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Partialy done The 1st and 3rd files corrected. PawełMM (talk) 12:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Watermark removal
-
retouched file
Article(s): Johanna Marau Ta‘aroa
Request: Please remove the watermark. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by PawełMM.
Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Could you upload over the original not make a new file?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Redone: File overloaded as requested. PawełMM (talk) 04:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Oval crop
Article(s): Kamehameha IV, Kanaina, Lunalilo, Thomas Nettleship Staley, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Charles Reed Bishop, Kekūanāoa, John Papa Īī, Kamāmalu
Request: Oval crop tiny black line at edge of oval... KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by PawełMM.
Done:Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Susan Walker Fitzgerald
Article(s): Susan Walker Fitzgerald
Request: Found this. It's a nice image badly in need of some TLC. (Grab hi-res tiff from LoC) JBarta (talk) 02:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 14:04, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Well done. JBarta (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Deep Throat restoration
-
Poster for 1972 pornographic film Deep Throat
-
Restored
-
File:DeepThroat.jpg
small image (with hands) -
Alternative version
Article(s): Deep Throat (film)
Request: Restore the poster, using the version already in the article as a guideline. If completed, please replace the old FUR image with the free image. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Done —Quibik (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about the hands? You did a fine restoration job, but I think it would be even better with a nice hand job as well. JBarta (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, in all seriousness, while the restored image is certainly of higher quality and higher resolution than the small image, I think the small image is a nicer picture for the article. It has the hands extending above the top border and the feet resting on the T. It looks like this restored poster was simply a re-working of the smaller image. JBarta (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I do agree that the smaller version looks much better (aside from the quality, of course). It's a fair use image though and the only justification for using FU images is that no free alternatives exist... so, that won't work. About the hands: I considered adding them, but I didn't like the idea of combining two (very different size) images to create an ugly franken-poster. You may of course add them, if you feel like it. I'd have nothing against that. However, the best option would be using a proper version of that image, if possible, like this one. The pre-70s US copyright notice system is not too clear to me, though. Could someone (Crisco 1942, I'm looking at you) please confirm or refute that image's public ___domain-ness? —Quibik (talk) 23:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pre 1977 US work with no copyright notice = Public ___domain. I asked at MCQ a while back for the poster for Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!, and they said it would be safe to assume that there will not be a copyright notice on the back of a poster. Any digitization of a 2-dimensional PD work of art is also PD, per Wikimedia's ruling. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer! I finally got around to uploading and cleaning up the alternative version. Here it is: File:Deep Throat poster 2.jpg. —Quibik (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Since the ourside of the image/poster is white, do you think it a good idea to give it a one or two pixel light gray outline to set it off? I did that once for a magazine cover and it turned out pretty well. JBarta (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I like your idea, but I would rather use CSS to accompish this. Luckily, {{Infobox film}} already has a
border
parameter which does exactly what you described. —Quibik (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2011 (UTC)- The CSS solution is an idealogical rather than practical solution. The CSS solution sounds nice, but is not always available (the gallery above being a perfect example). The old fashioned way works just as well, works every time, works everywhere, is dead simple and doesn't require anything more from the editor. JBarta (talk) 22:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I added an 8px-wide border to the image. —Quibik (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- The CSS solution is an idealogical rather than practical solution. The CSS solution sounds nice, but is not always available (the gallery above being a perfect example). The old fashioned way works just as well, works every time, works everywhere, is dead simple and doesn't require anything more from the editor. JBarta (talk) 22:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I like your idea, but I would rather use CSS to accompish this. Luckily, {{Infobox film}} already has a
- Since the ourside of the image/poster is white, do you think it a good idea to give it a one or two pixel light gray outline to set it off? I did that once for a magazine cover and it turned out pretty well. JBarta (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer! I finally got around to uploading and cleaning up the alternative version. Here it is: File:Deep Throat poster 2.jpg. —Quibik (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pre 1977 US work with no copyright notice = Public ___domain. I asked at MCQ a while back for the poster for Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!, and they said it would be safe to assume that there will not be a copyright notice on the back of a poster. Any digitization of a 2-dimensional PD work of art is also PD, per Wikimedia's ruling. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I do agree that the smaller version looks much better (aside from the quality, of course). It's a fair use image though and the only justification for using FU images is that no free alternatives exist... so, that won't work. About the hands: I considered adding them, but I didn't like the idea of combining two (very different size) images to create an ugly franken-poster. You may of course add them, if you feel like it. I'd have nothing against that. However, the best option would be using a proper version of that image, if possible, like this one. The pre-70s US copyright notice system is not too clear to me, though. Could someone (Crisco 1942, I'm looking at you) please confirm or refute that image's public ___domain-ness? —Quibik (talk) 23:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, in all seriousness, while the restored image is certainly of higher quality and higher resolution than the small image, I think the small image is a nicer picture for the article. It has the hands extending above the top border and the feet resting on the T. It looks like this restored poster was simply a re-working of the smaller image. JBarta (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about the hands? You did a fine restoration job, but I think it would be even better with a nice hand job as well. JBarta (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Date Line
Article(s): Date Line
Request: fix perspective... Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
There is a copyright issue with that file that should be resolved first. Besides, it's a piss poor photo that serves no useful purpose. That image should really be yanked from the article. JBarta (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed it from the article myself. Apparently this image has been deleted at least once before (under a different name) for copyright issues. It was just an eyesore in the article (my opinion). JBarta (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Watermark removal
-
The siege of Sparta (272 BC) by the army of King Pyrrhus of Epirus
Article(s): History of Sparta, Pyrrhus of Epirus, Siege of Sparta
Request: Please remove the watermark.Andres rojas22 (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- This version is better and easier to remove watermark from. If Quibik is around, his extraction of the original jpg from the zoomable preview would help a lot (I can get high-res version, but can not guarantee it is the original jpg, and here the higher resolution, the better). Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- You probably had the Dezoomify script (this, for anyone wondering) in mind. Unfortunately, Allposters.com does not use Zoomify, so that script will not work. I did find an alternative way to retrieve a reasonably large unwatermarked version. It is slightly blurrier than the watermarked version, though, so combining these two versions is a good idea. I wrote a JavaScript script (a bookmarklet) that gets both the watermarked and unwatermarked large images, in case anyone might want to get any other images from there:
javascript:r = /http:\/\/imagecache5d\.allposters\.com\/watermarker\/([^.]+)\.\D+(\d+)\D+(\d+)/.exec(document.body.innerHTML); if (!r) {alert("Failed to find the link. Sorry.");} else {window.open(r, Math.random()); window.open("http://frame.allposters.com/frameimagehandler/universal/frameimage.jpg?frame=[FAP:0+PRT:[PRW=" + r[3] + "|PRH=" + r[2] + "|PIP=\\" + r[1].replace(/-/g, '\\') + ".jpg]+QLT:101+MXW:" + r[3] + "+MXH:" + r[2] + "]", Math.random());} void(0);
- And another one for art.com, since it is pretty much the same website:
javascript:r = /popHighzoomImage\(([^,]+),([^,]+),[^,]+,'-?([^.]+)/.exec(document.body.innerHTML); r2 = /http:\/\/cache2\.artprintimages\.com\/p\/LRG\/([^\/]+\/[^\/]+\/[^\/]+)/.exec(document.body.innerHTML); if (!r || !r2) {alert("Failed to find the link. Sorry.");} else {window.open("http://imagecache5d.art.com/watermarker/" + r[3] + ".jpg", Math.random()); window.open("http://frame.artprintimages.com/frameimagehandler/universal/frameimage.jpg?frame=[FAP:0+PRT:[PRW=" + r[1] + "|PRH=" + r[2] + "|PIP=\\" + r2[1].replace(/\//g, '\\') + ".jpg]+QLT:101+MXW:" + r[1] + "+MXH:" + r[2] + "]", Math.random());} void(0);
- Simply execute them from the browser's address bar on an image description page. —Quibik (talk) 01:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! There is some difference between yours and watermarked version, perhaps also in color levels. For this image, the difference in sharpness/pixelation is too small (that I would bother with removing watermark and combining them :-). Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, I probably should have been more clear. By "combining these two versions is a good idea" I meant the two images that are opened by the script: a clean one and a watermarked one. Or am I misunderstanding you? —Quibik (talk) 02:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! There is some difference between yours and watermarked version, perhaps also in color levels. For this image, the difference in sharpness/pixelation is too small (that I would bother with removing watermark and combining them :-). Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- You probably had the Dezoomify script (this, for anyone wondering) in mind. Unfortunately, Allposters.com does not use Zoomify, so that script will not work. I did find an alternative way to retrieve a reasonably large unwatermarked version. It is slightly blurrier than the watermarked version, though, so combining these two versions is a good idea. I wrote a JavaScript script (a bookmarklet) that gets both the watermarked and unwatermarked large images, in case anyone might want to get any other images from there:
Rick Perry
-
Texas governor Rick Perry
Article(s): Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington
Request: Please remove the microphone in front of his shirt. William S. Saturn (talk) 04:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by PawełMM.
Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Al Piechota
-
Al Piechota playing for the Davenport Blue Sox in 1933
Article(s): Al Piechota
Request: Crop and remove watermark. Albacore (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done: JBarta (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Albacore (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Shore Line Electric Railway
-
Map of part of Shore Line Electric Railway
Article(s): Norwich and Westerly Railway plus others currently in draft
Request: Restore - correct misalignments, fill in gaps with blank map, and maybe restore a bit of lettering? I did a temporary cut-and-paste job to correct the worst misalignments, but I lack skill to truly restore the map. I can try for a slightly clearer scan if that will help, but the original image in the book I scanned from has these defects and I don't have access to the original. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Never mind. I found a PDF online that happens to include an original version of the map. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Cathedral
-
Remove...
Article(s): Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary (Moscow)
Request: ...cars; (brighten it up, so it won't be looking so depressing); retouch nave's wall; remove the spotlight in front of the wall. Thanks.♫GoP♫TCN 18:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Done As requested. nagualdesign (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Can you remove the other car? That would be excellent. ♫GoP♫TCN 12:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Don Laughlin
-
Don Laughlin (left)
Article(s): Don Laughlin
Request: Crop. 12.204.247.9 (talk) 07:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 09:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Ross Perot
-
Ross Perot portrait
Article(s): United States presidential election, 1992, United States presidential election, 1996
Request: Please can you brighten and clear up the image. Peter (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Poster fixes
-
Done -
Done -
Done -
Done
Article(s): Mutiny on the Bounty (1962 film), Mutiny on the Bounty (1935 film), Billy Rose's Jumbo, Long Day's Journey into Night (1962 film)
Request: Clean it up; fix some creases and folds. There may be a couple more to follow. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- K, that's it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by PawełMM.
Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Cropping
Article(s): List of Silent Hill, Silent Hill 2, and Silent Hill 3 characters
Request: The bottom row of panels as well as the logo and the panels on which the logo lies (the one with the person wearing a cap and the one at its left) need to be cropped; the bottom row and the panels with the logo depict characters who aren't covered by the article. Also, the third row should be moved a little to the right after the crop, to be uniform, so that there are gaps both left and right, not only right. Hula Hup (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
I'm finding your instructions a little confusing. Which rows/images do you wish to KEEP? – JBarta (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Re: The whole first and second rows, and from the third row keep only the 4 panels from the left (this means that I'd like the 2 far right panels, which are covered by the logo, to disappear). After this crop, there will be a gap to the right of the third row, caused by the disappearance of the 2 far right panels; I'd like the third row (which, by then, should only contain the 4 panels from the left) to be moved a little to the right, so that there are 2 gaps equal in size to its left and to its right, not just one to its right. Is it possible that the gaps will be black in color to match the black background or I'm asking too much? Hula Hup (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done: Removed the characters you requested and rearranged so that everything is even and spaced out nicely. Hope it works for you. – JBarta (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm very afraid this is not what I requested. The characters are messed up now; in the original version of the image, the first row had the characters of the first game in the series, the second row had the second game's characters, and the third row had the third game's (the ones covered by the logo and the fourth row's didn't belong to any of these 3 games, that's why I wanted them to be gone). If you could (without changing the character order) repeat the same process, but magnify the third row after the crop to the point that it is even with the first and second rows, instead of creating 2 gaps to the left and to the right, I'm done. Hula Hup (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- It didn't occur to me that they were in any particular order, sorry. I gave it another whirl. Does that do it for you? – JBarta (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm very afraid this is not what I requested. The characters are messed up now; in the original version of the image, the first row had the characters of the first game in the series, the second row had the second game's characters, and the third row had the third game's (the ones covered by the logo and the fourth row's didn't belong to any of these 3 games, that's why I wanted them to be gone). If you could (without changing the character order) repeat the same process, but magnify the third row after the crop to the point that it is even with the first and second rows, instead of creating 2 gaps to the left and to the right, I'm done. Hula Hup (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Perfect. Thank you very much. Hula Hup (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Mark Ferguson
Article(s): Mark Ferguson
Request: Please can you crop Mark Ferguson, the man, white shirt.Rain the 1 04:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Request taken by Fallschirmjäger. 11:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Done Sorry Fallschirmjäger! nagualdesign (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worries! Fallschirmjäger ✉ 11:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hurricane damage
Article(s): U.S. Virgin Islands
Request: Badly overexposed. Looks terrible in thumbnail. Rmhermen (talk) 01:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done Centpacrr (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Haalelea's Feather Cape
-
Done
-
Done Like this?
-
Done
Article(s): Haalelea, Featherwork, ʻahuʻula, Feather cloak
Request: Anyway to colorize this drawing of a Hawaiian feather cloak? KAVEBEAR (talk) 10:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): How does that look (above)? I took this image as a guide and did whatever I felt like doing. There wasn't much specified in the brief. Here's a little Christmas present if you (or anyone else) wants to give it a fiddle. (By which I mean do the other one!) :-) nagualdesign (talk) 05:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Can someone else do the other one?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Done PawełMM (talk) 11:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Archibald Cleghorn with family and grandchildren
Article(s): James Harbottle Boyd
Request: Please remove the crack down the middle of this photograph and attempt to repair the chip off the side of it. Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Could you please not crop or tamper with the coloring of the photograph, just fix the damages without cropping it. The coloring edit should come after the first part (so it can be stored in the history) and I don't believe any cropping is neccessary except a tiny part that isn't the image on the left. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done: Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 10:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Redone:
Black corner restored. Repaired without cropping the right side.PawełMM (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Redone: