Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Http file server

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user 82lfy1a93y96wr3p (talk | contribs) at 20:03, 13 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Fails to establish notability per WP:SOFT. Had tagged this {{prod}}, but User:Rawbanana who has only edited this article, removed it. Seems to be vanity/advertisement NTK 18:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Rawbanana's reply I'm not affiliated with this software in any way. However, I feel that it is a relatively unknown and yet revolutionary software and deserves to be recognized in Wikipedia. Please also understand that this is my first article and I do not really understand how to edit articles properly or format it properly for Wikipedia.

I edited my original submission thinking that it had added enough to justify entry into Wikipedia. If that is not enough and you still feel this article is not worthy, please delete it. In the meantime, I will try to learn more about the Wikipedia system and see if I can fulfill the Wikipedia requirements.

Note the information I have used in the article is primarily from the forums http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?c=6 or from Sourceforge.net. As for notability, there is an article about it in Italian I think... http://punto-informatico.it/download/scheda.asp?i=795 and it won 2004 www.snapfiles.com very good software award. According to a forum poster, it was also "discovered it though Hak.5 episode 9" although I can't find a link specifically.

I have tried to be neutral as much as possible. Again I didn't realize new entries were so hard to be approved for Wikipedia and I will try to read up on what this submission is missing. Should I have left the {{prod}} for someone else to remove? Oh well...

You may remove {{prod}} tags from articles you create, but if you do so you should put something on the talk page justifying why you think it should be included. Please read over the guidelines at WP:SOFT, and also WP:NOR. In short as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia should not be used to promote "relatively unknown" products, persons, or ideas. It should be used to document things that are already notable in their own right. NTK 20:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]