Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open source computer graphics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a bunch of mostly-unrelated summaries of several different other articles, and seems to have no redeeming content of its own at all. I don't think there's anything which could be done to make it useful, and even if there is, I think it could be done only by starting again. --Fuzzie (talk) 00:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no unique content. A rewrite is not out of the question, though. Royboycrashfan 00:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - arguably a reasonable topic, and the article does not look beyond redemption. Metamagician3000 01:45, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete full of main article links. Fetofs ^Hello! 01:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nothing special about this article, more or less a summary, a rewrite is useless. --Terence Ong 02:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with either Open Source or Computer Graphics. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 04:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Fetofs. -AED 07:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete, agree with nominator.-Mr Adequate 09:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Metamagician3000 -ALoopingIcon 16:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, per nom. Chris Chan.talk.contribs 18:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep removed the summaries but there isnt much left -- Astrokey44|talk 09:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Even as an open source supported I'm willing to say this would either be cruft or POV. —Ruud 14:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per non --Tango 23:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.