Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7 Notes to Infinity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find it much notable and also looks like a G11 Yash t 101 07:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep : I think I can help get sources. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck to Rsrikanth05. The article was sent to AFd just two minutes after it was created, with cleanup tags added eight minutes after nomination.[1] So, I just performed some cleanup for style and format,[2] but was myself unable to find suitable sources. It may be that the article is premature. However, if not enough sourcing is found to merit a separate article, perhaps it can be redirected to the director's article where it might at least be mentioned. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a Highbeam account now, perhaps I might be able to get more than Google. But maybe, if needed we could redirect it to Shrenik Rao if I'm unable to get anything. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Created a bit too early. Iv no doubt it will be recreated once notability is established, delete for now. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 07:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It really is too soon for this one. Best of luck to those involved in the show. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - After source searching, this topic currently appears to fail Wikipedia's General notability guideline WP:GNG. No prejudice toward recreation if the topic receives significant coverage in reliable sources in the future. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]