Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Infrastructure Modeling Simulation (CIMS)
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 01:41, 10 May 2012 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:41, 10 May 2012 by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Critical Infrastructure Modeling Simulation (CIMS) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software package. Miracle Pen (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unremarkable software package - I could not find significant coverage in independent sources, so notability is not demonstrated. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find the sourcing we'd need to show notability here. I'm happy to reconsider if someone finds something, but I'm coming up blank. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article's only reference is trivial coverage at best (per WP:GNG). As Ultraexactzz wrote, can't find anything further. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.