Talk:Babur (cruise missile)
Added extra info regarding the Babur Cruise Missile.
Please sing your comment's...anywhat, GREAT JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!, it look's great, and look's professional too, you should really start updating other pakistani defense related article's, that being said...keep a npov--Maliki 786 09:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Someone's been...."messing around" with the article, so I locked it, aight'? (any objections?)--Maliki 786 09:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
I am writting in behalf of my fellow editor, User:ءلی
We, the fore-mentioned and myself, have taken the liberty and responsibility of protecting the page of "Babur missile" for numerous reason's, one of them being vandalism. Along with the said vandalism, my collegue and I ,(and you if you decide to join)are going through a major revamping and expansion of this article ("Babur missile")and would appericiate it if you would put down reason's regarding major changes in the "Discussion" box.
This is NOT an attempt to take control of an article,(said "Babur missile") but to merely
to put a stop to repeated vandalism and what not, we are respected wikipedian's (or atleast think we are...) and would take any request to unblock this article in to consideration.
thank you for your time--Maliki 786 10:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Only administrators posses the power to protect a page. If you are interested in protecting this page, then please contact an administrator. By adding {{Protect}} template, a page cannot be protected. --Deepak|वार्ता 10:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
damn...Well, Keep every thing on that letter true, except for the protection part--Maliki 786 23:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Tomahawk reverse-engineering
An anonymous user added two paragraphs that Babur was reverse engineered from the Tomahawk with Chinese support, and an external link that did not back up this assertion. I have combined and reworded this contribution to add uncertainty and a supporting footnote. If there is a credible source (It's not great to use a forum discussion for an external link) that states for certain that it comes from the Tomahawk, please make the appropriate changes with a supporting footnote.
I think that you can see the existing footnote to see how to do them. If anyone can't figure it out, please let me know here and I can assist by putting it in. Thanks, BanyanTree 13:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- The article itself says that there is no evidence for the reverse engineering theory.. so why is that the first thing mentioned in the design paragraph? Fkh82 02:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
External link
i put an external link for Tomahawk reverse-engineering which does support this anonymous users claim..Thanks Tere naam