Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket Linux
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Metropolitan90 (talk | contribs) at 02:24, 12 April 2013 (→Pocket Linux: close as delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 02:24, 12 April 2013 by Metropolitan90 (talk | contribs) (→Pocket Linux: close as delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pocket Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Linux distribution. No significant, non-routine coverage in third-party sources (everything in the article is either a primary source, or trivial/routine coverage) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of notability at all and it hasn't been updated in 13 years, so I doubt it will any time soon. Half the article is literally a "not to be confused with more notable stuff" disclaimer. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 15:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it does seem quite difficult to believe this was ever really notable. Could perhaps have once been a brief mention in Linux but given its age and transience I doubt that would be justifiable now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:51, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.