Talk:Bayesian approaches to brain function

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conejo23 (talk | contribs) at 05:42, 16 May 2013 (Conejo23 moved page Talk:Bayesian brain to Talk:Bayesian approaches to brain function: There is agreement in the talk page for this new title. Also, Bayesian brain is already a book title.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Looie496
WikiProject iconMedicine Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNeuroscience Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I do not see the references displaying, have I done something wrong? Jockocampbell (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please disregard the above, I found the solution. Jockocampbell (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Currently free energy approaches get dramatically too much cover - they present a small part of the community studying Bayesian Brain. Also I would propose renaming this page "Bayesian approaches to Brain function" and have Bayesian brain forward to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koerding (talkcontribs) 09:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Make it Bayesian approaches to brain function and I'm in favor (no cap for "brain"). Regarding the rest, I think you should feel free to edit the article in whatever way you think improves it. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply