Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadow (programming)
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ezeu (talk | contribs) at 01:16, 30 May 2006 (Closing as "keep"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:16, 30 May 2006 by Ezeu (talk | contribs) (Closing as "keep")
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. --Ezeu 01:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
contested prod. Reasons provided ere "non notable software, vandalized for a month" -- Drini 04:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. "with ADvantages Over Windows" hardly makes it unique. Dlyons493 Talk 11:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep A Google search for "Meadow" and "emacs" seems to indicate that it is quite popular among Japenese Windows users. OhNoitsJamieTalk 20:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted for further consensus Computerjoe's talk 11:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep per Ohnoitsjamie or merge into Emacs J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Disk space is cheap, human effort isn't. No real reason to delete it, and well, almost all open source projects start small. Bryce 22:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the main Emacs article and add a one-line mention about this port in there. The article is really devoid of real information anyway. -- Hirudo 14:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.