Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoadChef
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Whouk (talk | contribs) at 07:57, 19 June 2006 (→[[RoadChef]]: closing - keep - I had my breakfast at one yesterday :-)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 07:57, 19 June 2006 by Whouk (talk | contribs) (→[[RoadChef]]: closing - keep - I had my breakfast at one yesterday :-))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP —Whouk (talk) 07:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company, pulls up a few hundred hits on Google but none of them do more than mention the company in passing. Aplomado talk 23:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn, see below. Aplomado talk 01:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Isn't having an article on a small company that owns a few rest stops going a little too far? Where 00:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, "one of the largest Motorway Services Area (MSA) operators in the UK, with 21 sites representing 24% of the market and serving some 60 million visitors each year" according to Google Finance. Extraordinary Machine 01:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, good point. I added that information to the article. I'll go ahead and withdraw my nomination now since I think that fact makes it keepable. Aplomado talk 01:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy close, since the nomination was withdrawn. --Coredesat 04:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.