Talk:Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christian75 (talk | contribs) at 17:47, 29 October 2014 (Assessment: +Computing (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Jkew in topic External links
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"1 byte per character"

When it says 1 byte per character (plus overhead) for many text files, that's exactly what it means. As long as they don't use obscure control characters, all text files in ASCII or ISO-8859-{1,5-9,11} use 1 byte per character plus a couple bytes at the start to set the mode. Not ~1 byte, 1 byte.--Prosfilaes 06:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're right; I shouldn't have added the tilde. —Steve Summit (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
ISO-8859-1 you are correct about, but other common encodings like windows-125x and the other parts of ISO-8859 do not map to contiguous unicode code points. Plugwash 23:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
ISO-8859-{1,5-9,11} map to contiguous Unicode code points. I think that's many text files.--Prosfilaes 17:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
the upper half of ISO-8859-5 mostly maps to $400-$45F but there are a number of positions that don't, in partiticular positions A0,AD,F0 and FD Plugwash 18:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's not entirely clear to me what benefit the link to SIL adds -- it's not to a relevant page, and indeed I can't find anything on SIL's site directly relating to SCSU. Remove the link? --Jkew 00:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Reply