Talk:Object-based language

Computing Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Template:Findsourcesnotice

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

There is currently an article: Object-based that covers the identical topic as this one. I propose Object-based be merged into Object-based language. MadScientistX11 (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Since no one commented in several months I went ahead and did the merge. There was almost nothing worth saving in the Object-based article, it was just a stub but what it did say that was of any merit (e.g. VB is an example of an object-based language) was either in or I incorporated into this article. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hierarchy of object-based languages

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

From the article, I understand not only that object-based is a hypernym of object-oriented, but that some prototype-based true object-oriented languages that do not have classes, but in which objects instead inherit their code and data directly from other "template" objects are inbetween these two notions. If is the case for all prototype-based languages? If not, does there exist a term for this case?--Sae1962 (talk) 13:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply