Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probabilistic solution discovery algorithm
- Probabilistic Solution Discovery Algorithm (PSDA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article does not meet our inclusion criteria. The page serve no other purpose than to promote José Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, the non-notable author who owns the work. On this note, José Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez should wait until his Algorithm becomes notable and widely discussed, then will someone with no WP:COI, who knows what a sensible article content should be and knows how to link to the title will write about it here.Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I am the author of the article, I think this algorithm is becoming noticed in the literature as about 42 peer-reviewed articles have used this method to solve optimization problems. It is important to keep this article available in Wiki because it describes a technique that belong to Evolutionary algorithms and was shown to be a useful one. The author has no interest to promote José Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez or his co-author. I have modified the article to fix its weaknesses and will continue to modify it as long as my time allows. Mohammed Muaafa (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- delete per nom. In reply to the above that it may be useful is not a criteria. Nor does it need to be here for people to find it; they can refer to the original papers. It needs reliable secondary sources, i.e. sources other than the original papers, which discuss it in depth to establish notability.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 02:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - this seems to be original research, which we do not publish, by a single primary author, for whom we are not a free resume host. Bearian (talk) 21:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Original concept. Antigng (talk) 05:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- With all due respect to your opinions, I wonder why these articles, which talk about similar techniques, were published in Wikipedia. Those articles are Harmony search
Evolutionary programming Gene expression programming Evolution strategies Interactive evolutionary algorithm Differential evolution Neuroevolution Learning classifier system Mohammed Muaafa (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
• contribs) 17:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)