Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/March

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting | Proposals | Archive | 2015
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dawynn (talk | contribs) at 18:16, 21 March 2015 (→NEW PROPOSALS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dawynn in topic Proposals, March 2015

Proposals, March 2015

Latest comment: 10 years ago56 comments5 people in discussion

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

Category:North American history stubs

Speedy request. To go with the other continental history categories. Will pick up:

Dawynn (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha stubs

Speedy request. The current Category:Saint Helena stubs is a properly supportable category. But it is overpopulated with extra templates. So leave {{SaintHelena-stub}} and {{SaintHelena-geo-stub}} in the Saint Helena category (with 85 pages total), but upmerge the current category to the SH, A & TdC category. Move these templates to the new category:

Dawynn (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Solomon Islands people stubs

Speedy request. To pick up the following:

Dawynn (talk) 04:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Macanese people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up the following:

Dawynn (talk) 03:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy support Gug01 (talk) 13:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Réunionnais people stubs

Speedy request. To pick up {{Réunion-bio-stub}} (84 P). Dawynn (talk) 02:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Equatoguinean people stubs

Speedy proposal. We already have a full Category:Equatoguinean sportspeople stubs. This is a natural parent category. Will also pick up:

Dawynn (talk) 01:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Northern Territory stubs

I propose creating Category:Northern Territory stubs/{{NorthernTerritory-stub}} - this should pick up Category:Northern Territory geography stubs (189 stubs), as well as all of the pages listed here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

New Zealand railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal: {{NewZealand-railstation-stub}} with Category:New Zealand railway station stubs to pick up all 73 of the articles remaining in Category:Oceanian railway station stubs (all of which are NZ) plus 40 or so in Category:New Zealand rail transport stubs. Category will be sub to those two plus Category:New Zealand building and structure stubs and Category:Railway stations in New Zealand. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Support assuming the accuracy of the proposal. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Support Logical. Gug01 (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:South Australia building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:South Australia building and structure stubs/{{SouthAustralia-struct-stub}} - this should pick up at least the 37 {{SouthAustralia-school-stub}}s and the 35 {{SouthAustralia-railstation-stub}}s (proposed below). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Queensland building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:Queensland building and structure stubs/{{Queensland-struct-stub}} - this should at least pick up Category:Queensland airport stubs and Category:Queensland school stubs, each of which having more than 60 stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Support Gug01 (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New spider family categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New family proposals to help split up the oversized Category:Spider stubs:

Dawynn (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Support Seems obvious, just helps. I don't see how anyone can oppose, so if no one else comments I'll close the review tomorrow. Gug01 (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Deltaproteobacteria stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up {{Deltaproteobacteria-stub}} which has now reached 60 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Support. I'll close it since its a speedy request. Gug01 (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Missing politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Adding these handful of templates will provide a -politician-stub template for all recognized countries and dependencies with more than 50,000 people:

Dawynn (talk) 12:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Support Seems like a good template network here. Gug01 (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Missing sport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following sport templates. This will provide -sport-stub templates for all recognized countries and dependencies with a population > 150,000 people:

Dawynn (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy support Agree. Makes sense for all templates. Gug01 (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Missing building and structure templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following templates. This will provide -struct-stub templates for all countries and dependencies with more than 275,000 people:

Dawynn (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I'd support this, but I don't think there is need for {{Martinique-struct-stub}} because it has only 5 pages. Gug01 (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm thinking Martinique, Réunion, and Guadeloupe can wait for now. Dawynn (talk) 01:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Missing bio templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following absent templates. This provides -bio-stub templates for all recognized countries and dependencies with more than 10,000 people:

Dawynn (talk) 12:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Could you please say how many stubs articles would go in the stub categories? Gug01 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Helped me see where categories will fill in quickly. I cancelled the Sint Maarten / Saint Martin request because catscan only showed 11 articles between the two. Dawynn (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
OK. I'll close the debate now. Gug01 (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Svalbard stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Even though we have an overpopulated Category:Svalbard geography stubs, there is no parent category to put this in. Propose template {{Svalbard-stub}} and category Category:Svalbard stubs. The category will pick up the aforementioned geography category as well as existing template {{Svalbard-church-stub}}. Add in new templates {{Svalbard-bio-stub}} and {{Svalbard-struct-stub}} to round things out. Dawynn (talk) 12:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Upmerged NZ photographers (ditto Canada, Australia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi folks - long time no see. Proposing an upmerged {{NewZealand-photographer-stub}} to feed into Category:Photographer stubs and Category:New Zealand artist stubs. Speediable S2. Currently looks like about 25-35 articles which could take this template. Grutness...wha? 00:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

There were 39. Grutness...wha?

Similar speediable templates for {{Canada-photographer-stub}} and {{Australia-photographer-stub}} look useful. Grutness...wha? 00:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Support Go ahead. Gug01 (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Miscellaneous new speedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A bunch of other templates that are ready for categories. Propose speedy approval:

Dawynn (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

I presume Category:Red dwarf star stubs, not Category:Red dwarf start stubs. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Corrected. Dawynn (talk) 22:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New geography splits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following new geography splits for which I could find no prior proposal. As all of these have passed the 60 mark, proposing speedy approval:

Dawynn (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New North Carolina NRHP splits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following new speedy splits:

Dawynn (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New taxonomy splits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following new speedy splits.

Dawynn (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Support Support the taxonomy splits. Gug01 (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
I'll close the review by tomorrow if nobody else comments. Gug01 (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Haliplidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
I propose that the Category:Haliplidae stubs is created. It will contain 20 articles (nearly all the articles in the Category:Haliplidae). Gug01 (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Oppose. There is already an upmerged template for this family. As noted, the template has not been adequately filled (please see guidelines above), and the parent (Category:Adephaga stubs) does not need splitting at this time. Even the parent contains less than 100 articles - a fair, but small size for a stub category. Dawynn (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Rove beetle stubs (renamed as Category:Staphylinidae stubs)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose a category for {{Staphylinidae-stub}}. Should contain more than 30 articles. Makes sense since I'm planning to create some more. Gug01 (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Support under modified name. The tag is used on 77 articles, so I approve making a category, but please name it Category:Staphylinidae stubs, instead. This will align the stub category with the permanent category (Category:Staphylinidae). Dawynn (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Sure. Agreed. I'll make the category. Gug01 (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Golf tournament stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose an exploratory template and potential category.

Dawynn (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

How about a split by country? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I could go for that. To begin with, how about building a couple of exploratory templates, with categories, if enough articles exist.
Dawynn (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Hesperiinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split out the two largest tribes:

Dawynn (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. Very necessary. Please do it quick before the category reaches above 900. Gug01 (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Tachinidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting by subfamily. Build permanent categories while building stub categories. Build templates first, categories if more than 60 articles.

Dawynn (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes. Go ahead. Gug01 (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/March&oldid=652907893"