User talk:Rschen7754
Global sysop
Granted. You might also wish to subscribe to mail:global-sysops. Good luck with the new buttons and thanks for helping! Trijnsteltalk 16:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Congrats! --Glaisher [talk] 16:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Are you in #swmt-talk yet? PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- MF-W has added Rschen to the channel's access list. --Glaisher [talk] 17:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- A big congratulations to you Rschen7754! Wait till you are a steward and you'll love it... --~ curtaintoad ~~ talk ~ 06:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- MF-W has added Rschen to the channel's access list. --Glaisher [talk] 17:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Are you in #swmt-talk yet? PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have submitted a subscription request, but am waiting for it to be approved.
- Thanks to everyone who supported. Following my failed CU nomination on enwiki that turned unnecessarily hostile, I was dreading running for anything ever again. I did get a few opposes of the same nature as those on enwiki, but I am more than grateful for the level of support that I received here. Almost a year ago was the first time I ever was a "global" editor, and while the last year hasn't exactly been pain-free, it's been a good experience. --Rschen7754 06:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, it is hard to keep up with a newborn at home. I have been trying to get into the admin console for a bit now, but all I get is white page. will retry later today to get in and approve it. --Jyothis (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- @Leinad: as you are the other listed admin, is this something that you can assist with? --Rschen7754 20:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Rschen, has the thought ever crossed your mind that, maybe, the reason your CU self-nomination failed ... lies with you? With your actions? Maybe you shouldn't try to blame the sane people who oppose you (as "unnecessarily hostile"), and instead spend some time figuring out what you are doing wrong, and correct it. ~ DanielTom (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Considering that I had the support of quite a few arbitrators, and one arbitrator told me flat out that he did not understand the rationale of the opposers, no. --Rschen7754 20:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Do we have any provision to handle this types of users, whose user page remains with some self promotional stuff in many wiki projects. As the files are heavily used (?); we have a difficulty to delete them! JKadavoor Jee 15:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we would have to go to each wiki and request deletion. --Rschen7754 20:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Rollback is for vandals?
Hi. Please explain this revert. PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- To me it is very incomprehensible and may very well be reverted away from the Forum, even if it is not strictly vandalism. If you want to reply to it, why don't you just restore it? --MF-W 22:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's a crosswiki troll, if you look at the block on enwiki. --Rschen7754 00:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
tvar
Hi. Why did you change all the tvars? Are you going to update each translation as well? If you are, it's better to use names than meaningless numbers, and the numbers really don't matter (they don't need to be in order). PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I realized what this was doing before I marked it for translation, and I have since fixed it. --Rschen7754 23:17, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
About the report of my requests
Dear Rschen, as I have talked to you before, I have stopped my annoying actions and I knew the problem, do you mind to delete the page? Thanks for your attention. Cheers, Gabriel Lee
- Page blanked, but please don't make mass requests for rights on Wikimedia. --Rschen7754 09:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Subtle vandalism in comments
Hi. Who is this in diff 6639685? PiRSquared17 (talk) 03:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Some guy who spammed crappy articles crosswiki, and who MF-W gblocked. He had an account on Commons before it got locked, but I forget the name. --Rschen7754 05:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
MediaWiki
Hello. Here are the translations some messages in polish language. Please move this pages from "MediaWiki talk" to "MediaWiki" namespace. Thanks, Rzuwig► 13:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Done but next time you may get a quicker response at RFH. --Rschen7754 03:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism cross wiki affects eswiki
Hi Rschen, I write you to demands your help. Since yesterday someone creates a script on several small Wikipedias. The script uses FastButtons to paste vandalic messages on talk pages of eswiki users (see this page for more information). Today Tbloemink deletes a script on vewiki, but there is another page with this vandalic script:
- here,
Can you delete this page, and ban the Fbmal account, please. Thank you for your time, and spent a good time. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra Talk) 23:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC).
- Done --Rschen7754 02:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- I hope you realize that there is nothing stopping this user (under a different account) from creating a copy of the script or even just running it in their browser console. There is no way to prevent the abuser from using this script, but there is a way to minimize the effects of the script: create an abusefilter for a certain rate limit, and set it to disallow with an appropriate warning. Just my two cents, sorry for butting in. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, hopefully they don't think of that. --Rschen7754 09:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you Rschen for your help, it is very appreciate. Now, there are running two filters here programmed by local sysops. Is it better a globalfilter?
- Best regards, Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra Talk) 22:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC).
- Yeah, hopefully they don't think of that. --Rschen7754 09:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- I hope you realize that there is nothing stopping this user (under a different account) from creating a copy of the script or even just running it in their browser console. There is no way to prevent the abuser from using this script, but there is a way to minimize the effects of the script: create an abusefilter for a certain rate limit, and set it to disallow with an appropriate warning. Just my two cents, sorry for butting in. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)