Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey to the Source: Decoding Matrix Trilogy

Journey to the Source: Decoding Matrix Trilogy

Journey to the Source: Decoding Matrix Trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An attempt at AfD was made by 110.20.234.69 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and I agree--plus I can do this more easily. Non-notable book, self-published, promotional, etc. Drmies (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting this started. This book is not used as a reference in the literature about the Matrix and is unreviewed. Therefore, this article should be deleted. --110.20.234.69 (talk) 03:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Nothing suggests that WP:BKCRIT is met.--Rpclod (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possibly speedy as having no assertion of notability. Guy (Help!) 16:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. It is almost six years old yet has not been remarked on in secondary sources. Also neither of the EL's worked when I tried them. MarnetteD|Talk 01:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the final decision is to delete it will also need to be removed from Template:The Matrix. MarnetteD|Talk 01:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]