Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/BAE Systems/archive 1
Article already gone through peer review and the suggested improvements have been made. I believe it now meets FAC status in my opinion, and I would also welcome any other suggestions. Mark83 22:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm going to start by being a little brash—sorry, but I hope there are not as many redundancies and grammatical glitches in the article as there are in your short nomination text:
- The a
Article hasalreadygone through peer review and the suggested improvements have been made. I believe itnowmeets the requirements for FAC statusin my opinion, and; Iwould alsowelcomeany otherfurther suggestions.
Tony 05:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- I would not describe your attitude as "brash", rather incredibly pompous and confrontational. Perhaps wrongly I did not believe FAC requirements applied to nomination text! Mark83 12:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- They don't, so relax. I was wrong: the article is quite well written. However, people here won't like the lists. Is there some way of reducing their size and/or shifting them down to the bottom of the article? The main objection will be that they detract from the flow of the text. Tony 14:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- I would not describe your attitude as "brash", rather incredibly pompous and confrontational. Perhaps wrongly I did not believe FAC requirements applied to nomination text! Mark83 12:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)