Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palpable Computing
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) at 16:59, 5 August 2006 (Closed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 16:59, 5 August 2006 by CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) (Closed)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Nonsense. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neoligism. All google hits on this term are related to the PalCom project in which context the term was coined. I could not find any independent sources that allow for the verification of the use of this term. -- Koffieyahoo 01:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unbearable essay-ish goobledegook. --Rhwawn talk to Rhwawn 03:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Almost patent nonsense? Molerat 12:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pretty darn close to patent nonsense. It's a collection of indecipherable jargon. At the least it's a neologism. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above... it's pretty incoherent, so if someone wants to take it upon themselves to speedy this as patent nonsense, don't expect me to cry. --Kinu t/c 20:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Tagged as such. Molerat 16:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.