Accuracy Dispute
There is no evidence whatsoever presented of the practice of "human placentophagy". It is highly dubious. The author should cite his sources I think. ReithySockPuppet 20:23, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
You're troll, why do you just go after this page? why don't you go after the childbirth page too? I don't know why I even reply to you
Moved to talk, awaiting cites
- In a few cultures it is custom for the mother to eat the Placenta after their newborn's birth. Thoese who advocate Placentophagy in humans believe that eating the placenta prevents postpartum depression and other pregnancy complications.
- Human Placenta has also been the ingredient in some traditional Chinese medicines.
Since these claims have been disputed, please give cites to support them before putting them back in the article. -- The Anome 00:33, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Everyone editing the page besides me and you is all the same user... There currently is an abritration case open again them... They use multiple accounts to make thier editrs seem like they have a concenus, and have been trolling me and every single Edit i make
- Then the way to move forward is to provide cites for your statements; attempts to remove well-cited NPOV text without consensus on the talk page tends to be classed as vandalism, and they will either have to work with you according to the rules or be blocked from editing. However, first the onus is on you to provide the cites and put your text into the NPOV style. -- The Anome 00:49, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
it is in npov style... and why didn't he equally go after the childbirth article.. go edit it. Human placentophagy is a known fact.
Thanks for the cite. Ive also added one for the Chinese medicine bit. -- The Anome 01:16, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC) How many more cites are needed do you think? ReithySockPuppet 02:21, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)