Convex preferences

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Erel Segal (talk | contribs) at 19:42, 29 November 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In economics, convex preferences is a property of an individual's ordering of various outcomes which roughly corresponds to the idea that "averages are better than the extremes". The concept roughly corresponds to the concept of diminishing marginal utility without requiring utility functions.

Notation

Comparable to the greater-than-or-equal-to ordering relation   for real numbers, the notation   below can be translated as: 'is at least as good as' (in preference satisfaction).

Similarly,   can be translated as 'is strictly better than' (in preference satisfaction).

Definition

Use x, y, and z to denote three consumption bundles (combinations of various quantities of various goods). Formally, a preference relation   on the consumption set X is called convex if for any

  where   and  ,

and for every  :

 .

i.e, for any two bundles that are each viewed as being at least as good as a third bundle, a weighted average of the two bundles is viewed as being at least as good than the third bundle.

A preference relation   is called strictly convex if for any

  where  ,  , and  ,

and for every  :

 

i.e, for any two distinct bundles that are each viewed as being at least as good as a third bundle, a weighted average of the two bundles (including a positive amount of each bundle) is viewed as being strictly better than the third bundle.

Alternative definition

Use x and y to denote two consumption bundles. A preference relation   is called convex if for any

  where  

and for every  :

 .

That is, if a bundle y is preferred over a bundle x, then any mix of y with x is still preferred over x. [1]

A preference relation is called strictly convex if for any

  where  

and for every  :

 .
 .

That is, for any two bundles that are viewed as being equivalent, a weighted average of the two bundles is better than each of these bundles.[2]

Examples

1. If there is only a single commodity type, then any weakly-monotonically-increasing preference relation is convex. This is because, if   and  , then every weighted average of y and z is also  .


Relation to indifference curves and utility functions

A set of convex-shaped indifference curves displays convex preferences: Given a convex indifference curve containing the set of all bundles (of two or more goods) that are all viewed as equally desired, the set of all goods bundles that are viewed as being at least as desired as those on the indifference curve is a convex set.

Convex preferences with their associated convex indifference mapping arise from quasi-concave utility functions, although these are not necessary for the analysis of preferences.

References

  • Hal R. Varian; Intermediate Microeconomics A Modern Approach. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-92702-4

See also