Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMS (statistical method)
- MMS (statistical method) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement for a recent journal article; see Talk page. fgnievinski (talk) 19:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Based only on a single primary source in a journal of dubious quality that has been cited only once, by its own authors. WP:TOOSOON to have gained any academic impact. Fails WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:OR at its best. Note that the creator also modified the article Outlier with a series of (not really) minor edits to add this method in there. I advocate deleting the resulting mention there as well. TigraanClick here to contact me 10:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not quite OR since it has been published elsewhere. However, also not notable (yet). If it does become notable in the future, we don't want the article tainted with COI and advocacy. Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)