Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky News Weather Channel programming

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JMWt (talk | contribs) at 07:19, 5 May 2016 (r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Sky News Weather Channel programming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP: NOTTVGUIDE - Wikipedia is not a directory, which this is displaying. 🎓 Corkythehornetfan 🎓 13:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a list of programmes is not encyclopedic. JMWt (talk) 21:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - While I would agree with deleting this particular article, considering it doesn't cite a single reference nor do any of the programs have their own article, as well as the fact it is horribly out of date, I disagree with the blanket statement "a list of programmes is not encyclopedic". There are dozens of articles that list programs airing on a network (List of programs broadcast by NBC, ABC, Bravo to name a few examples) that link to articles and/or reference titles. -- Whats new?(talk) 05:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • I know that there are a whole load of other similar pages. Personally, I don't consider this to be a particularly useful argument in AfD discussions as per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and would !vote delete for all of those as well. As you've stated, the problem is that they rapidly go out of date anyway, so are pretty useless even in their own terms. A list of TV programmes with no particular reason to suggest that they're notable is not encyclopedic in my opinion. WP: NOTTVGUIDE. JMWt (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]