Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheetah Girls 3 (second nomination)

The Cheetah Girls 3 (second nomination)

This AfD was not completely filled out, so I've taken the liberty of fixing it up and listing it. During the first AfD the article's creator decided to delete it. No opinion (yet) from me. Srose (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No IMDb entry yet, still being written, entirely speculative, fails WP:NOT. --Wafulz 18:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and this entire article is speculative. Upon investigation, I've found that there's not really anything to base speculation upon, and so the article is unsalvageable. Srose (talk) 18:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete again. Danny Lilithborne 19:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'd say to salt the space as well, but the Cheetah Girls appears to be a popular enough group that a third movie wouldn't be out of the question. That being said, until this movie has been confirmed to exist, it doesn't deserve an article yet. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 21:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect until more information comes up about this. This would fit better in a section in The Cheetah Girls 2 or a related article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bibliomaniac15 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 25 August 2006.
• Merge into The Cheetah Girls 2: When in Spain. So the film's been "brought up, and talked about", as have countless other sequels that never get made. Extraordinary Machine 22:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Extraordinary Machine. 1ne 04:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect until more information is released. This article has potential, since ratings for the first and second were so high.
• Delete there is no IMDB page, and is still not confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arigont (talk • contribs)
• Keep or Merge with the other Cheetah Girls's pages. If I can find a place where the magazine can be found then I can scan the pic in from the magazine. (Does anybody know where I can get a copy of Dinsey Insider??) Until then keep it or merge it with the other Cheetah pages. Jtervin 17:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - speculative, unsourced, WP is not a crystal ball. Unsourced material should not be merged into an exisiting article. BlueValour 15:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This seems very possible and just because something cannnot be sourced online does not make it untrue. 65.60.164.62 18:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: No. Read WP:V. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge second paragraph only. Gazpacho 21:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Until there is official confirmation by the Walt Disney Company that a 3rd Cheetah Girls movie will be produced, this article should not exist. This is a speculative piece that belongs as an editorial or a posting on a forum somewhere. This type of speculatory work discredits Wikipedia as a factual resource, particularly as an encyclopedia. RabidPanda V 21:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong or Speedy Delete. These movies must be verified as in production for them to be listed. User:Lord Hawk 00:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, crystal ball. The closest thing to a source for this movie is speculation from the actresses. As was said before, when there's a verifiable source for the movie (IMDB page, or even a press release from Disney), then we can talk about making the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• KeepWith the ratings of the premiere of The Cheetah Girls 2, a 3rd movie is definetly not out of the question, in fact we know that there will be more television, whether it's a movie or a television show, Disney isn't just going to drop The Cheetah Girls, disney is all about the money, and it certainly made money.so just keep this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msteal2342 (talk • contribs)

• Comment You are missing the point of what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is not a repository of every rumor you hear about your favorite singing group. It is supposed to be an encyclopedia of verified information, backed up by reliable sources. There are a list of things that Wikipedia is not, and one of those things is being used to store news and rumors like it's your own website. –NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 00:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Srose. Michael Greiner 02:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]