Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Proposals, November 2015
Colobotheini stub template & category
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
I propose created a stub template and category for Category:Colobotheini, which has around 90 or so stubs at least. Gug01 (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy creation Gug01 (talk) 20:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Russian footballer midfielders
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Both speedy eligible for their own category by S1:
- {{Russia-footy-midfielder-1996-stub}} -- Category:Russian football midfielder, 1996 birth stubs, 98 tranclusions.
- {{Russia-footy-midfielder-1997-stub}} -- Category:Russian football midfielder, 1997 birth stubs, 62 tranclusions
Note that the parent category is currently misnamed, it should be birth (singular) stubs, not births stubs. (See, for example, Category:English football defender stubs or Category:American business biography, 20th-century birth stubs.) CFDS coming when I have time, because there a whole bunch with the same issue. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 00:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy support --Redrose64 (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Created. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 03:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Speedy eligible for standalone cat, per S1. 124 transclusions. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 22:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Created. Cat at Category:People's Republic of China bridge (structure) stubs. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 03:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Same again, heavily populated (dead on 888 right now). Suggest upmerged templates by county, giving own category to any with 60+ (unlikely to be many given 93 counties for an average of 10>), then grouping where appropriate to actually diffuse. Initial idea is to use the three metro areas with their own articles: Grand Island metropolitan area, Lincoln, Nebraska metropolitan area and Omaha–Council Bluffs metropolitan area (but only for those in Nebraska, as otherwise the category structure will get weird; this is the format Category:Louisville metropolitan area, Kentucky geography stubs uses despite some counties in Indiana being within the whole metro area). Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 20:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support I support a split only with any category 60 or above stubs. For the other ones, I would prefer for each category with less than 60 stubs to be discussed one by one. Gug01 (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
{{NewJersey-geo-stub}} split
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Cat with 4 figures-worth of stubs. Suggesting the standard split by county, upmerged to start with, then any with over 60 be given their own category. Since there are 1200~ articles and only 21 counties, giving an average of 57~, a fair few should well qualify for their own category. Nonetheless I think a regional split makes a lot of sense here: North Jersey, Central Jersey, and South Jersey, while not officially defined, do have reasonable splits given. Each of them has lists of counties contained within each, off of which I would base the structure. The only issues are the counties of Hunterdon (north/central), Ocean (central/south) and Union (north/central). Given Hunterdon is in Category:Central Jersey and neither of the other two are, I would suggest we follow that, with Ocean in south and Union in north. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 18:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support as proposed. Pegship (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Rumeshkhan geo stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Rumeshkhan County was created 2 years ago, in a split from Kuhdasht County. Someone has created {{Rumeshkhan-geo-stub}} as a redirect to the natural parent {{Lorestan-geo-stub}}, but that seems kinda awkward -- I would suggest an upmerged template would be a better way of handling it, given that every other county in the province has its own stub tag. This currently isn't used widely enough for a full stub -- the redirect has 38 transclusions -- but it's entirely possible that many Kuhdasht County articles have not yet been renamed/retagged, so the potential to grow into a standalone category is there in the future. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 23:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, no objections, created. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 03:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)