Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environment //+ (programming language)
- Environment //+ (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is probably a hoax, and is probably made up. The idea that the company wants to remain anonymous sounds like nonsense. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Given the purported name and the the purported anonymity, this is unsourceable. Υπογράφω (talk) 04:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as it reads like an advertisement which fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions) 04:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Forget notability (which it apparently doesn't have, per my review), why hasn't this been speedied? Lourdes 05:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - What speedy category? Software doesn't fit any of the A7 categories, because it isn't a company, person, or web content. It isn't advertising if it doesn't describe the product well enough to try to sell it. Probably hoax, but the speedy criterion is clear hoaxes. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)