Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consecutive sampling

Consecutive sampling

Consecutive sampling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay and/or a host of OR(To quote--The author of this text once conducted.....) .Does not seem to be notable by itself.A redirect may be plausible. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 17:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article seems to be based on a couple of references in the paper. It does not merit it's own article. Can be redirected to design of experiments or other relevant article. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Old wine, new bottle. The term is Convenience sample as it is defined in the article. Rhadow (talk) 00:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge to Nonprobability sampling. I have rewritten the article, eliminating OR and adding RS references. The article is now backed by six book sources. A simple WP:BEFORE style search shows this to be a common technique of nonprobability sampling in epidemiology, and is different than convenience sampling. There is enough material out there to support a reasonable stub-class article. But merging to nonprobability sampling would also be a good option and might provide better context. --Mark viking (talk) 05:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]