Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cysteine Motif and Prediction Database
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WOSlinker (talk | contribs) at 17:26, 30 September 2017 (fix some lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 17:26, 30 September 2017 by WOSlinker (talk | contribs) (fix some lint errors)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 11:31, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cysteine Motif and Prediction Database (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An highly specialised biochemical database. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – no publication describing this database has as yet been published in a peer reviewed journal. Boghog (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of notability. Consider speedy deletion per WP:COPYVIO as the bulk of the text identical to the copyrighted external link.Novangelis (talk) 17:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.