Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of project risk analysis software

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Newslinger (talk | contribs) at 09:24, 27 July 2018 (Fix signature. Previously used {{subst:coloredlink}} in signature, which made the link to my username :User:Newslinger instead of User:Newslinger (note the extra colon). This was preventing my !votes from being tracked in AfD stats). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Comparison of project risk analysis software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product catalog violating WP:CSC (non-notable entries in an incomplete list), WP:V (just adding an unspecific root ___domain in each row is not "sourcing", the entire page uses exactly zero independent sources), WP:OR (a lot of the content seems to be based on the original author's own research and analysis of these products). This comparison fails several basic content requirements and should be deleted (or re-draftified). Wikipedia is not a host for personal research results, nor a directory for indiscriminate unsourced information (WP:NOT). GermanJoe (talk) 10:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]