Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Bluth's unrealized projects

Don Bluth's unrealized projects

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Don Bluth's unrealized projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Due to the heavy reliance on a random collection of images hosted on imgur and a wiki page from TV Tropes, I can't tell if the things in this article are even real or if it's WP:NFT. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just think we need to collect better citations/references for this page. Some of the films have suitable citations/references, but it is in dire need of more.Cardei012597 (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: GameSpot and Polygon aren't exactly the gold standard of sourcing but they're the most reliable citations we've got in this article. If all the content which references unreliable sources such as Imgur and TVTropes is removed, we're left with so little content it might as well be redirected to Don Bluth. A dynamite case methinks. SITH (talk) 22:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I think if we just try to surf the web, gather better sources and citations, we can improve the page. We shouldn't give up. Cardei012597 (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I appreciate that you feel personally invested in improving this article, but I suggest you take a good long look at WP:RS for what qualifies as reliable. Adding unreliable sources to the article isn't going to change anyone's mind, or improve the article. I also agree with SITH's suggestion that you start by making a well referenced section on the topic in the article on Don Bluth rather than jumping straight to a separate article that needs to meet independent notability requirements. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Even if this were better sourced, it's overly detailed listcruft (yet missing the details of how far into the production phase these actually got and is actually worth mentioning) that is better summarized in the main article. Reywas92^Talk 23:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]