Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacGregor State High School

MacGregor State High School

Lack of notability, nothing in this page meets the parameters outlined in WP:SCHOOLS or WP:SCHOOLS3. Sufficient precedent has been set on this subject for the removal of school articles that do not meet these qualificiations. 'However', find something that sets this school apart enough to deem it notable and I will reverse my position. Trusilver 22:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Article is better than it originally was, although I still don't think it lives up to notability standards, I'm fairly open to any new information presented. Trusilver 03:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all schools. --Czj 20:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? — Haeleth Talk 22:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: article makes no particular claim of notability and contains no information other than what one would expect to find in a directory or prospectus. This is an encyclopedia, not a directory or prospectus. — Haeleth Talk 22:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I also doubt the claims that a school with 1800 pupils is one of the largest schools in Qld. Viridae ^Talk 23:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Haeleth. Also, how come everytime a high school is nominated someone votes keep and says that all schools are notable? TJ Spyke 00:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- When I used to comment reguarly on AfDs (before uni took over) that used to be the norm. It is refreshing to see that it is no longer the case. Viridae ^Talk 00:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:SCHOOLS3. Lankiveil 00:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, contains information one would expect to find in an encyclopedia, like the history of the school. Saying we can't find out the history of a school because that would also be included in a prospectus is just bullshit. Kappa 01:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- All schools are notable. I think it's highly arrogant to say otherwise. -- Chisrule 01:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? Viridae^Talk 01:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Schools educate, mold our youth, create memories, experiences and should be considered something more. I'm Wiki newbie, but feel strongly about this, am I misunderstanding something?? -- Chisrule 01:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Possibly you might like to read WP:SCHOOLS3. Wikipedia doesnt work in blanket notability. Viridae ^Talk 02:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Longhair\^talk 02:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the grounds of duplicated information ONLY. The notable aspects are already covered at Macgregor, Queensland. There's no need for duplication in two articles. However, I'm very tempted to ask for a keep. Just because the subject requests deletion should not mean that it should be deleted. Wikipedia needs to make a strong case against this sort of thing happening. JROBBO 02:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]