Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Analyzethis

Analyzethis‎

Analyzethis (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
67.131.148.171 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
61.90.228.106 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) (likely proxy)
68.202.109.43 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) (likely proxy)
218.154.70.93 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) (likely proxy)

Code letter: F

Good day. I suspect that Analyzethis (talk · contribs) is evading a block via the IP addresses above; here are applicable diffs:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Thanks. --Takeel 13:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The IPs listed are, in cronological order:

First Commonwealth Cablevision, Virginia, USA
True Internet Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand
Road Runner, Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
KORNET, Korea Telecom

Barring the possiblity of open proxies, that list makes sockpuppetry highly unlikely; checkusering at this stage would be nothing more than a fishing expedition. Essjay (Talk) 13:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Three of the 4 are listed on at least one blacklist here. Would it be worth taking a look to see if the Virginia Cablevision address is related to the user? Thatcher131 15:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I scanned each IP on 26 ports for open proxy behavior; I can find no evidence of proxying. Essjay (Talk) 01:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]