Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ring (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:N from the talk page, and also WP:TOOSOON. Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 09:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (software) and wider WP:N policy, passing mentions outside primary sources. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No significant coverage from third-party sources and also no indication of meeting NSOFT. --94rain Talk 11:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete For the sake of steelmanning, I'll point out that this article in Youm7 could be argued to constitute WP:SIGCOV. But I'm still inclined to delete for a few reasons: a) WP:GNG says that "multiple sources are generally expected", and I can't find any other reliable secondary sources covering this topic b) I don't think this Youm7 article/interview is particularly reliable for establishing the notability of the programming language itself. It's as much about the interviewee (Fayed) as the language. And if this were a notable programming language, I would expect coverage in RS that cover technology/computer science. c) The interview (in Jan 2016) talks about the language as something newly announced which is about to be published. So WP:SUSTAINED and WP:CRYSTALBALL come into play. Colin M (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)