Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics

Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What makes this committee pass WP:NORG? Ping User:Fayenatic London who PRODDED it (only for the prod to be removed with no rationale by another editor). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/merge The IEEE is a large and respectable professional body. The worst case for this topic would be merger to a page such as IEEE_Computer_Society#Technical_committees per WP:ATD-M. Deletion is therefore not appropriate and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:ITSIMPORTANT is not a particularly good article. Important according to whom? Committees are rarely notable and the sourcing here proves this - nobody discusses the body outside IEEE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]