Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics

Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What makes this committee pass WP:NORG? Ping User:Fayenatic London who PRODDED it (only for the prod to be removed with no rationale by another editor). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/merge The IEEE is a large and respectable professional body. The worst case for this topic would be merger to a page such as IEEE_Computer_Society#Technical_committees per WP:ATD-M. Deletion is therefore not appropriate and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:ITSIMPORTANT is not a particularly good article. Important according to whom? Committees are rarely notable and the sourcing here proves this - nobody discusses the body outside IEEE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge Similar situation to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Committee on VLSI. There is no dispute at all that the IEEE is notable, and even it's societies are notable, but individual committees under them less so. The sources look to be mostly primary. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I too don't think we can create this article without depending on a lot of primary sources, thus it should be merged. Santosh L (talk) 06:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]