User talk:Evil Monkey/Archive 2

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Evil Monkey (talk | contribs) at 02:05, 31 January 2005 (changed stuff around so it more logical). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello. Archive is where you can find all the old posts of this page. Some of this was posted on User Talk:WikiUser but was copied here by that user.

Stop sabotaging articles

"don't revert without comment;" "-No, rather it's "Be Civil", don't order me to obey you with claims that are the opposite of The Wikipedia rules and stop sabotaging that article and changing it so it's stating things that aren't true. I didn't research that article and give my time for you to come in an have a bit of causual fun changing it to make it incorrect. You don't give a damn about Claire Weekes. WikiUser 20:59, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Howdy, Part of my changes to the article were only say the page conformed with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies), which states the the lead sentence should be the way that I have structured it. I was also removing some material that I thought was POV and editing the article to make it easier to read. I also fixed some mistakes like having an 1970's instead of 1970s. Also Revert#Explain_reverts states that you should always explain why you reverted the page not just leave a blank edit summary. Evil MonkeyTalk 21:48, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)
All the information needed for people to see what was going on was available. I wouldn't edit an article on, say economics, if I didn't know anything about it. Please only edit articles to improve them. Not make them worse or pointless. WikiUser 18:20, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Stop taking all my articles and sabotaging them by putting in spelling and grammar mistakes and other stuff to make them worse. There's a covention here- British English for British subjects and articles that are already in British English. You're giving me extra work unecessarily. Can you give me a break and find someone else to latch onto, or just do it to your own articles? WikiUser 18:00, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Can you please point where I have added "spelling and grammar mistakes and other stuff to make them worse." Looking back through my contributions for edits I've made to 'your' articles:
Evil MonkeyTalk 03:47, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
On top of your targetted abuse and trashing articles you want me to do all your wiki editing for you now. Look STOP TARGETTING ME FOR ABUSE.OK? One more an I'm pursuing all the complaint actions available on the wikipedia against yer.OK?WikiUser 13:48, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

POSTED BY WikiUser 14:35, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Re your joint attack with 3 other users against me.

Your deleting of all other edits and complaints against you that were here , is additional proof of your mendacious targetting of me.

FOR THE BENEFIT OF WIKI USERS WHO FOLLOW THE RULES and will be concerned about such abuse against hardworking wikiusers like me: WikiUser

Prabakharan

To resolve the issues I have posted a what I consider to nbe a fair description of the subject. I will ask rajesh user:Rrjanbiah for his views as well. In editing na article it is impossible to avoid POV. I have tried my best to avoid offending anybody by trying not to demonise him or glorify hm.Sirimewan