[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Addnode Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A company article by a disclosed paid editor that has been draftified 3 times and was unilaterally moved back to mainspace in all of these cases. Looking at Google Translate, the given sources don't seem to establish that this passes NCORP, and a BEFORE search didn't give me any usable English-language coverage either. Someone with knowledge of Swedish may have better luck, but I think it's time that we get this one out of the draftification cycle. Best, Blablubbs|talk 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs|talk 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs|talk 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs|talk 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I have discussed improvements in the Teahouse as well as with reviewers. I got the suggestion to add "Stub" to the article, which I did and therefore moved it to mainspace again. Please point me in the right direction if I am mismanaging this, but I do not think the stub should be "moved for deletion" I see many similar stub articles with sometimes only the company webpage as reference. For reference look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Swedish_company_stubs. I assume the stub tag is included for this reason. I have included multplie references in addition to the company's annual report for exapmle. As for notability, the company is no Apple or Microsoft, but it a rather large company in Sweden employing around 1,600 people all over Europe. Again for reference, one can compare it to the other companies in the Swedish stub category.
Lastly I think the stub article is written in a a factual manner based on publicly available information. I have complied with disclosure requirements of wikipedia.Gustav Addnode (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)