Centralizer and normalizer

(Redirected from Commutant)

In mathematics, especially group theory, the centralizer (also called commutant[1][2]) of a subset S in a group G is the set of elements of G that commute with every element of S, or equivalently, the set of elements such that conjugation by leaves each element of S fixed. The normalizer of S in G is the set of elements of G that satisfy the weaker condition of leaving the set fixed under conjugation. The centralizer and normalizer of S are subgroups of G. Many techniques in group theory are based on studying the centralizers and normalizers of suitable subsets S.

Suitably formulated, the definitions also apply to semigroups.

In ring theory, the centralizer of a subset of a ring is defined with respect to the multiplication of the ring (a semigroup operation). The centralizer of a subset of a ring R is a subring of R. This article also deals with centralizers and normalizers in a Lie algebra.

The idealizer in a semigroup or ring is another construction that is in the same vein as the centralizer and normalizer.

Definitions

edit

Group and semigroup

edit

The centralizer of a subset   of group (or semigroup) G is defined as[3]

 

where only the first definition applies to semigroups. If there is no ambiguity about the group in question, the G can be suppressed from the notation. When   is a singleton set, we write CG(a) instead of CG({a}). Another less common notation for the centralizer is Z(a), which parallels the notation for the center. With this latter notation, one must be careful to avoid confusion between the center of a group G, Z(G), and the centralizer of an element g in G, Z(g).

The normalizer of S in the group (or semigroup) G is defined as

 

where again only the first definition applies to semigroups. If the set   is a subgroup of  , then the normalizer   is the largest subgroup   where   is a normal subgroup of  . The definitions of centralizer and normalizer are similar but not identical. If g is in the centralizer of   and s is in  , then it must be that gs = sg, but if g is in the normalizer, then gs = tg for some t in  , with t possibly different from s. That is, elements of the centralizer of   must commute pointwise with  , but elements of the normalizer of S need only commute with S as a set. The same notational conventions mentioned above for centralizers also apply to normalizers. The normalizer should not be confused with the normal closure.

Clearly   and both are subgroups of  .

Ring, algebra over a field, Lie ring, and Lie algebra

edit

If R is a ring or an algebra over a field, and   is a subset of R, then the centralizer of   is exactly as defined for groups, with R in the place of G.

If   is a Lie algebra (or Lie ring) with Lie product [x, y], then the centralizer of a subset   of   is defined to be[4]

 

The definition of centralizers for Lie rings is linked to the definition for rings in the following way. If R is an associative ring, then R can be given the bracket product [x, y] = xyyx. Of course then xy = yx if and only if [x, y] = 0. If we denote the set R with the bracket product as LR, then clearly the ring centralizer of   in R is equal to the Lie ring centralizer of   in LR.

The Lie bracket can also be viewed as an operation of the set   on itself, because  . The Lie braket makes   a group and its Centerlizer would then be all elements   However, since the Lie bracket is alternating, this condition is equivalent to   Thus, the centrelizer is defined in the same way for Lie algebras as for Groups.

The normalizer of a subset   of a Lie algebra (or Lie ring)   is given by[4]

 

While this is the standard usage of the term "normalizer" in Lie algebra, this construction is actually the idealizer of the set   in  . If   is an additive subgroup of  , then   is the largest Lie subring (or Lie subalgebra, as the case may be) in which   is a Lie ideal.[5]

Example

edit

Consider the group

  (the symmetric group of permutations of 3 elements).

Take a subset   of the group  :

 

Note that   is the identity permutation in   and retains the order of each element and   is the permutation that fixes the first element and swaps the second and third element.

The normalizer of   with respect to the group   are all elements of   that yield the set   (potentially permuted) when the element conjugates  . Working out the example for each element of  :

  when applied to  :  ; therefore   is in the normalizer  .
  when applied to  :  ; therefore   is in the normalizer  .
  when applied to  :  ; therefore   is not in the normalizer  .
  when applied to  :  ; therefore   is not in the normalizer  .
  when applied to  :  ; therefore   is not in the normalizer  .
  when applied to  :  ; therefore   is not in the normalizer  .

Therefore, the normalizer   of   in   is   since both these group elements preserve the set   under conjugation.

The centralizer of the group   is the set of elements that leave each element of   unchanged by conjugation; that is, the set of elements that commutes with every element in  . It's clear in this example that the only such element in S3 is   itself ([1, 2, 3], [1, 3, 2]).

Properties

edit

Semigroups

edit

Let   denote the centralizer of   in the semigroup  ; i.e.   Then   forms a subsemigroup and  ; i.e. a commutant is its own bicommutant.

Groups

edit

Source:[6]

  • The centralizer and normalizer of   are both subgroups of G.
  • Clearly, CG(S) ⊆ NG(S). In fact, CG(S) is always a normal subgroup of NG(S), being the kernel of the homomorphism NG(S) → Bij(S) and the group NG(S)/CG(S) acts by conjugation as a group of bijections on S. E.g. the Weyl group of a compact Lie group G with a torus T is defined as W(G,T) = NG(T)/CG(T), and especially if the torus is maximal (i.e. CG(T) = T) it is a central tool in the theory of Lie groups.
  • CG(CG(S)) contains  , but CG(S) need not contain  . Containment occurs exactly when   is abelian.
  • If H is a subgroup of G, then NG(H) contains H.
  • If H is a subgroup of G, then the largest subgroup of G in which H is normal is the subgroup NG(H).
  • If   is a subset of G such that all elements of S commute with each other, then the largest subgroup of G whose center contains   is the subgroup CG(S).
  • A subgroup H of a group G is called a self-normalizing subgroup of G if NG(H) = H.
  • The center of G is exactly CG(G) and G is an abelian group if and only if CG(G) = Z(G) = G.
  • For singleton sets, CG(a) = NG(a).
  • By symmetry, if   and T are two subsets of G, T ⊆ CG(S) if and only if S ⊆ CG(T).
  • For a subgroup H of group G, the N/C theorem states that the factor group NG(H)/CG(H) is isomorphic to a subgroup of Aut(H), the group of automorphisms of H. Since NG(G) = G and CG(G) = Z(G), the N/C theorem also implies that G/Z(G) is isomorphic to Inn(G), the subgroup of Aut(G) consisting of all inner automorphisms of G.
  • If we define a group homomorphism T : G → Inn(G) by T(x)(g) = Tx(g) = xgx−1, then we can describe NG(S) and CG(S) in terms of the group action of Inn(G) on G: the stabilizer of   in Inn(G) is T(NG(S)), and the subgroup of Inn(G) fixing   pointwise is T(CG(S)).
  • A subgroup H of a group G is said to be C-closed or self-bicommutant if H = CG(S) for some subset SG. If so, then in fact, H = CG(CG(H)).

Rings and algebras over a field

edit

Source:[4]

  • Centralizers in rings and in algebras over a field are subrings and subalgebras over a field, respectively; centralizers in Lie rings and in Lie algebras are Lie subrings and Lie subalgebras, respectively.
  • The normalizer of   in a Lie ring contains the centralizer of  .
  • CR(CR(S)) contains   but is not necessarily equal. The double centralizer theorem deals with situations where equality occurs.
  • If   is an additive subgroup of a Lie ring A, then NA(S) is the largest Lie subring of A in which   is a Lie ideal.
  • If   is a Lie subring of a Lie ring A, then S ⊆ NA(S).

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Kevin O'Meara; John Clark; Charles Vinsonhaler (2011). Advanced Topics in Linear Algebra: Weaving Matrix Problems Through the Weyr Form. Oxford University Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-19-979373-0.
  2. ^ Karl Heinrich Hofmann; Sidney A. Morris (2007). The Lie Theory of Connected Pro-Lie Groups: A Structure Theory for Pro-Lie Algebras, Pro-Lie Groups, and Connected Locally Compact Groups. European Mathematical Society. p. 30. ISBN 978-3-03719-032-6.
  3. ^ Jacobson (2009), p. 41
  4. ^ a b c Jacobson 1979, p. 28.
  5. ^ Jacobson 1979, p. 57.
  6. ^ Isaacs 2009, Chapters 1−3.

References

edit