Draft:2FABypass

Submission declined on 15 August 2025 by Timtrent (talk). This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Timtrent 6 days ago. Last edited by Timtrent 4 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 15 August 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects Essay-like writing Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references Close paraphrasing Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models. Declined by Theroadislong 6 days ago.

Submission declined on 15 August 2025 by Caleb Stanford (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects Essay-like writing Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references Close paraphrasing Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models. Declined by Caleb Stanford 7 days ago.

Submission declined on 14 August 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects Essay-like writing Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references Close paraphrasing Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models. Declined by Pythoncoder 7 days ago.

• Comment: Please see WP:NOTHOWTO 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:21, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: 100% AI generated Theroadislong (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

---

Techniques used to bypass Two-Factor Authentication

2FABypass is a topic of growing concern in cybersecurity, as attackers continue to find ways to bypass protections that were once considered Multi-factor authentication. This page is intended to document known techniques used to bypass the 2FA and highlight notable incidents, with the goal of reviewing the vulnerability loopholes and dangers of the internet user related to 2FABypass.

This page is maintained by members of the DheReckahsTeam Web Security Investigation Project.

Common Techniques

Several methods have been observed in real world attacks:

• Attackers may hijack active session tokens, allowing them to bypass 2FA challenges and gain unauthorized access.^[1]

• Social engineering tactics are used to trick users into revealing passwords or authentication codes, often by impersonating trusted sources.

• Misconfigured OAuth login flows can inadvertently allow attackers to bypass authentication layers.^[2]

• Prompt bombing involves overwhelming users with repeated 2FA requests, leading them to approve one out of frustration.^[3]

• Phishing kits and automation tools such as Muraena and NecroBrowser simulate login environments to capture credentials and session data.^[4]

Notable Incidents

In 2024, the FBI’s Atlanta Division issued a public warning about the theft of browser cookies and session tokens used to bypass multifactor authentication. These attacks targeted email and cloud services, resulting in widespread data breaches and financial losses.^[5][6][7]

See Also

• Authentication
• Phishing
• Cybercrime
• Cybersecurity
• Authentication protocol
• Universal 2nd Factor
• Identity threat detection and response

External Links

• 2FABypass DheReckahsTeam Web Security Investigation Project
• HackTricks – Practical guide to bypassing 2FA and MFA in web applications
• Snopes – Fact-check and summary of FBI's warning about 2FA vulnerabilities
• BestofAI – Analysis of ransomware surge linked to AI-driven 2FA bypass techniques

References

1. "Session Hijacking". Ping Identity. 2025.
2. "OAuth Misconfiguration". SecureLayer7. 2025.
3. "Prompt Bombing". NephoSec. 2022.
4. "Phishing Scam". Yahoo Finance. 2019.
5. "Cybercriminals Are Stealing Cookies to Bypass Multifactor Authentication". FBI.gov. 2024.
6. "FBI Warns: 2FA Bypass Attacks Are Surging". KryptoCybersecurity. 2025.
7. "FBI Warning Issued As 2FA Bypass Attacks Surge". Forbes. 2025.

This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.

Categories:

• Cybersecurity
• Authentication methods
• Computer access control
• Ethical hacking
• Wikipedia essays