Draft:Dialectica (company)

Submission declined on 27 August 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by DoubleGrazing 42 hours ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 42 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 27 August 2025 by Kovcszaln6 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kovcszaln6 2 days ago.

Submission declined on 26 August 2025 by Praxidicae (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Praxidicae 2 days ago.

Submission declined on 24 August 2025 by Kovcszaln6 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kovcszaln6 4 days ago.

Submission declined on 23 August 2025 by Stuartyeates (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Stuartyeates 6 days ago.

Submission declined on 21 August 2025 by BuySomeApples (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by BuySomeApples 7 days ago.

• Comment: The first source is user-generated, and therefore largely useless. The two articles about the opening of the Vancouver office are just routine business reporting. And the FT ranking is a nothingburger. This leaves just one source, Ekathimerini, which alone cannot establish notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Please fix the 404 references. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: See WP:FORBES. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

---

Information services company

Dialectica

Company type	Private
Industry	Information services
Founded	2015
Founders	George Tsarouchas Frederick Corkett
Headquarters	London , United Kingdom
Area served	Worldwide
Key people	George Tsarouchas (CEO) Frederick Corkett (Managing Director)
Services	Expert network
Number of employees	2,000+ (2025)[1]
Website	www.dialectica.io

Dialectica is a private information services company that operates in the expert network industry. It was founded in Athens in 2015 and is headquartered in London.^[2]

In 2021, BetaKit reported that the company planned to open offices in Montréal and Vancouver and hire more than 500 employees in Canada.^[3] Techcouver also covered the Vancouver expansion, noting the creation of 100 local jobs.^[4]

Dialectica has appeared on the Financial Times/Statista FT 1000: Europe’s Fastest-Growing Companies ranking, placing 342nd overall in 2024.^[5]

References

1. "Dialectica Company Profile". PitchBook. Retrieved 26 August 2025.
2. Konti, Despina (22 December 2019). "Greek-owned startup is a real dealmaker". Ekathimerini. Retrieved 26 August 2025.
3. Scott, Josh (9 November 2021). "Dialectica plans to hire 500 people in Canada, open Vancouver office". BetaKit. Retrieved 26 August 2025.
4. "Dialectica to open Vancouver office, hire 100 employees". Techcouver. 9 November 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2025.
5. "FT 1000: the eighth annual ranking of Europe's fastest-growing companies". Financial Times. 1 March 2024. Retrieved 26 August 2025.

Category:Companies based in London Category:Companies established in 2015