Mac Lane coherence theorem

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, Mac Lane's coherence theorem states, in the words of Saunders Mac Lane, “every diagram commutes”.[1] This result was once thought to be the essence of the coherence theorem, but regarding a result about certain commutative diagrams, Kelly argued that, "no longer be seen as constituting the essence of a coherence theorem".[2][3] More precisely (cf. #Counter-example), it states every formal diagram commutes, where "formal diagram" is an analog of well-formed formulae and terms in proof theory.

The theorem can be stated as a strictification result; namely, every monoidal category is monoidally equivalent to a strict monoidal category.[4]

Counter-example

edit

It is not reasonable to expect we can show literally every diagram commutes, due to the following example of Isbell.[5]

Let   be a skeleton of the category of sets and D a unique countable set in it; note   by uniqueness. Let   be the projection onto the first factor. For any functions  , we have  . Now, suppose the natural isomorphisms   are the identity; in particular, that is the case for  . Then for any  , since   is the identity and is natural,

 .

Since   is an epimorphism, this implies  . Similarly, using the projection onto the second factor, we get   and so  , which is absurd.

Proof

edit

Coherence condition (Monoidal category)

edit
  • Let a bifunctor   called the tensor product, a natural isomorphism  , called the associator:
 
  • Also, let   an identity object and   has a left identity, a natural isomorphism   called the left unitor:
 
as well as, let   has a right identity, a natural isomorphism   called the right unitor:
 .

Since there are many ways to construct an isomorphism using the above natural isomorphism, they impose a condition called the coherence condition on the above natural isomorphism. If the above isomorphism satisfies the following conditions, they are called coherence conditions: the arrows constructed by get tensor products and compositions from identity morphisms, natural isomorphisms, and their inverses are equal, if their domains and codomains of the arrows are same.[6][7] If the coherence condition is satisfied, then no matter how they construct the isomorphism, they will always end up with the same isomorphism.

Pentagon and triangle identity (Coherence axiom)

edit

To satisfy the coherence condition, it is enough to prove just the pentagon and triangle identity, which is essentially the same as what is stated in Kelly's (1964) paper.[6]    

Mac Lane coherence theorem for monoidal category

edit

Mac Lane coherence theorem: In a monoidal category ( ), every diagram whose vertices come from words in   and   and whose edges come from the natural isomorphisms   commute.[8][9] To prove this theorem, it is enough to show that the pentagon and triangle identities hold.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Mac Lane 1998, Ch VII, § 2.
  2. ^ Kelly 1974, 1.2
  3. ^ Power 1989, 1. Introduction
  4. ^ Schauenburg 2001
  5. ^ Mac Lane 1998, Ch VII. the end of § 1.
  6. ^ a b Kelly 1964
  7. ^ Laplaza 1972b
  8. ^ Loday & Vallette 2012
  9. ^ Yau & Johnson 2024, Theorem 1.3.3

References

edit
  • Kelly, G.M (1964). "On MacLane's conditions for coherence of natural associativities, commutativities, etc". Journal of Algebra. 1 (4): 397–402. doi:10.1016/0021-8693(64)90018-3.
  • Hasegawa, Masahito (2009). "On traced monoidal closed categories". Mathematical Structures in Computer Science. 19 (2): 217–244. doi:10.1017/S0960129508007184.
  • Joyal, A.; Street, R. (1993). "Braided Tensor Categories". Advances in Mathematics. 102 (1): 20–78. doi:10.1006/aima.1993.1055.
  • MacLane, Saunders (October 1963). "Natural Associativity and Commutativity". Rice Institute Pamphlet - Rice University Studies. hdl:1911/62865.
  • MacLane, Saunders (1965). "Categorical algebra". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 71 (1): 40–106. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1965-11234-4.
  • MacLane, Saunders (1970). "Coherence and canonical maps". Symposia Mathematica, Vol. IV (INDAM, Rome, 1968/69). Academic Press, London-New York. pp. 231–242.
  • Mac Lane, Saunders (1998). Categories for the working mathematician. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-98403-8. OCLC 37928530.
  • Section 5 of Saunders Mac Lane, Mac Lane, Saunders (1976). "Topology and logic as a source of algebra". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 82 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1976-13928-6.
  • Schauenburg, Peter (2001). "Turning monoidal categories into strict ones". The New York Journal of Mathematics [Electronic Only]. 7: 257–265. ISSN 1076-9803.
  • Loday, Jean-Louis; Vallette, Bruno (8 August 2012). Algebraic Operads. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 346. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30362-3. hdl:21.11116/0000-0004-1D0F-D. ISBN 978-3-642-30362-3.
  • Power, A.J. (1989). "A general coherence result". Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 57 (2): 165–173. doi:10.1016/0022-4049(89)90113-8.
  • Selinger, P. (2010). "A Survey of Graphical Languages for Monoidal Categories". New Structures for Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics. Vol. 813. pp. 289–355. arXiv:0908.3347. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12821-9_4. ISBN 978-3-642-12820-2.
  • Laplaza, Miguel L. (1972a). "Coherence for distributivity". Coherence in Categories. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 281. pp. 29–65. doi:10.1007/BFb0059555. ISBN 978-3-540-05963-9.
  • Laplaza, Miguel L. (1972b). "Coherence for categories with associativity, commutativity and distributivity". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 78 (2): 220–222. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1972-12925-2.
  • Yau, Donald; Johnson, Niles (2024). Bimonoidal categories, En-monoidal categories, and algebraic K-theory. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-1-4704-7941-1.

Further reading

edit
edit