Meta:Requests for CheckUser information/Archives/2023
 | Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in 2023, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
باسم
- باسم (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
- Michel Bakni (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
- Zolgoyo (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
There are some concerns that they are all trolling by canvassing each other, which may too hard to be from different real users. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- No need to check them, they are three different users, Bassem and Michel are very well-known admins in Arabic Wikipedia. Bassem is also a check user in Arabic Wikipedia. they also had extended rights on other Wikis. Please check their meta pages. On the other hand, Zolgoyo is not related to them at all, doesn't know Arabic, and doesn't have access to Arabic Wikipedia and many more easy differences. This is a random UserChecking, please investigate more before asking to check users. --Sandra HANBO (talk) 07:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Sandra Hanbo Have you read OA2022? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- i dont believe they are puppet. but i have concerns for canvassing too. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: Since canvassing, which is what is alleged in this request, is not something CheckUser can uncover, I'm leaning towards declining this CU request. CC: @Vermont & Xaosflux. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio I'm in decline here. @Liuxinyu970226, I'm not seeing that you have presented evidence here, just a list of users. Evidence should be supported by diffs, explaining which policies are being violated. Disruptive canvasing is generally about mass solicitations as well, contacting just 2 people falls short of that. — xaosflux Talk 13:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: if someone is disruptively canvassing, that can be brought up at RFH. — xaosflux Talk 13:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio and Xaosflux, how can't OA2022 be a reason too? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 if you have a specific office actions concern, you may contact ca
wikimedia
org directly. Checkuser is not a fishing expedition. If you are trying to report someone for global ban/lock evasion, the meta-wiki local checkuser request page (where we are now) is not the correct forum either. — xaosflux Talk 14:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I withdrawn. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 if you have a specific office actions concern, you may contact ca
- @MarcoAurelio and Xaosflux, how can't OA2022 be a reason too? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: if someone is disruptively canvassing, that can be brought up at RFH. — xaosflux Talk 13:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Sagbosam
I am requesting a CheckUser on my account (User: Sagbosam) to know the accounts that I am "associated with". There are allegations laid against me at this Grant talk that my account is "associated with a series of banned users" by YPam (WMF) and I am yet to get answers on the list of the "series of banned users that I am associated with". If this is not the right channel to request to know the "series of banned user associated with me", Please let me know the right channel.Sagbosam (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Not done the checkuser policy does not allow for this. It appears you have a conflict with a WMF employee, acting in the course of their employment. You may follow up with that department. — xaosflux Talk 18:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Additional contacts related to that program are also listed here: Grants:Community Resources. — xaosflux Talk 18:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you Sagbosam (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Additional contacts related to that program are also listed here: Grants:Community Resources. — xaosflux Talk 18:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
New accounts at Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Guadeloupe Creole
- Istwalezanti (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
- Stive699 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
- Ridj land (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
- Keirenwashere (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
In patrolling new accounts I came across 4 accounts that were created and as their first global edit supported the proposal, and while the accounts might have been created independently by supporters of the language, the fact that they all were created within a few hours of each other, didn't give a reason in their support, and signed their support the same way (--~~~~ with the two --, which to be fair I also do) suggests that there might be something else going on. To be clear this report is not because of their support for the proposal, I'm not involved in new language wikis (outside of being a GS and so patrolling them) and don't care one way or the other how the proposal ends up. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely These accounts are technically dissimilar. — xaosflux Talk 05:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: Superpes15 (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
