Meta:Requests for translation adminship/~aanzx

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

~aanzx

• ~aanzx (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy)  Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Hello, I would like to request translation admin rights on this to mark pages for translation for some of pages created by me for workshops Kannada Language Workshop, have marked User:~aanzx/translate-test page for translation. Although I wasn't sure if I can mark whole section with bulleted list, please let know I need to know about any changes necessary to that page, And i also would if a page can be partially marked for translation for example I didn't marked Interested in participating section intentionally.--~aanzx · ✉ · © 05:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support: sysop on multiple Kannada projects, valid rationale for requesting. Svārtava (tɕ) 10:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Not sure if I feel comfortable with ~aanzx requesting TA with this happening not too long ago. //shb (t • c) 10:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  is there a particular reason for opposing, i withdrew steward application because i was not position to reply vague questions. apart from that if you have any concerns i would abuse tool then please mention the reason. --~aanzx · ✉ · © 11:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not concerned by the steward candidacy - translation admin is almost diametrically opposite to steward in level of trust. This then comes down to the usual prepared page review. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 19:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not super concerned about the steward candidacy itself, I'm more concerned about the candidate's inability to recognise why they failed – and that's a major issue for a perm where they need to be receptive to feedback. Even just in this thread alone, the way ~aanzx handled criticism from Minorax was piss poor. //shb (t • c) 07:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment The page you prepared doesn't comply with Meta:Internationalization guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:38, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Minorax i have updated page so that names are not meant to be translated, please let me if there anything other than that needed to be changed.--~aanzx · ✉ · © 04:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  If the names are not meant to be translated, and the list only contains such names, why include them into the translation unit? Furthermore, why is there a chunk of wikitext included into a translation unit at the top. Sorry, but I don't think you're ready to get translation admin, so I'm going to  Oppose. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 05:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I have removed wikitext on top of that page, I wasn't sure about leaving out as i thought you were referring not to translate name content when you told me to refer International guidelines, if there any thing else i should do please let me know. --~aanzx · ✉ · © 05:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry, I don't think you're ready to get the TA user right. I prompted you twice and the page still doesn't comply with Meta:Internationalization guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 06:13, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Minorax , thanks for your response, i also couldn't figure out what else i can do to improve that page, for now i would like to withdraw this request, --~aanzx · ✉ · © 06:20, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Request withdrawn by candidate. Ternera (talk) 14:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.