Wikipedia

Petrov's Defence

(Redirected from Petroff Defence)
"Russian Game" redirects here. For the film, see The Russian Game.

Petrov's Defence or the Petrov Defence (also called Petroff Defence, Petrov's Game, Russian Defence, or Russian Game [Russian: Русская партия]) is a chess opening characterised by the following moves:

Petrov's Defence
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
f8 black bishop
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
d7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
f6 black knight
e5 black pawn
e4 white pawn
f3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
d2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
b1 white knight
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Moves1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6
ECOC42–C43
Named afterAlexander Petrov
ParentKing's Knight Opening
Synonym(s)
  • Petroff Defence
  • Petrov's Game
  • Russian Defence
  • Russian Game
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6

Though this symmetrical response has a long history, it was first popularised by Alexander Petrov, a Russian chess player in the mid-19th century. In recognition of the early investigations by the Russian masters Petrov and Carl Jaenisch, this opening is called the Russian Game in some countries.

The Petrov has a drawish reputation; however, it offers attacking opportunities for both sides, and a few lines are quite sharp. Often a trade occurs and Black, after gaining a tempo, has a well-placed knight. Pillsbury's game in 1895[1] against Emanuel Lasker testifies to this. The Black counterattack in the centre also avoids the Ruy Lopez, Giuoco Piano (and other lines of the Italian Game), and the Scotch Game. The Petrov has been adopted by many of the world's leading players, including world champions Vasily Smyslov, Tigran Petrosian, Anatoly Karpov, and Vladimir Kramnik, along with grandmaster Fabiano Caruana and others.

The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings codes for Petrov's Defence are C43 (for 3.d4) and C42 (for all other lines).[2]

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

Analysis

edit

White's two main choices are 3.Nxe5 (the Classical Variation) and 3.d4 (the Steinitz Variation). 3.Nxe5 is more popular but they often lead to similar positions and "there is no clear reason to prefer one move over the other".[3]

3.Nc3 may transpose to the Four Knights Game. 3.Bc4 may lead to the Boden–Kieseritzky Gambit or transpose to the Two Knights Defence or Bishop's Opening. Occasionally seen is the quiet 3.d3.

Classical Variation: 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4

edit
abcdefgh
8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 3.Nxe5 d6

After 3.Nxe5, the Classical Variation, the standard reply for Black is 3...d6. Play usually continues 4.Nf3 Nxe4, after which several moves are commonly played.

Main line: 5.d4

edit

This is the most common line and typically most often continues 5...d5 6.Bd3. The position is similar to an Exchange French in which Black has played the extra move ...Nf6–e4, though this extra move is not necessarily to Black's advantage. White will try to drive Black's advanced knight from e4 with moves like c4 and Re1. In practice White is usually able to achieve this, but at some structural cost such as having to play c4, which balances out.[4]

Nimzowitsch Attack: 5.Nc3

edit

A completely different approach is to meet 4...Nxe4 with 5.Nc3 Nxc3 6.dxc3 with rapid development and queenside castling. For instance, White can plan a quick Be3, Qd2, and 0-0-0, and play for a kingside attack, trusting that the doubled c-pawns will help protect the king, and that a strong initiative and attacking potential will offset the longterm disadvantage of having doubled pawns. In the 5.Nc3 line, Black must avoid 5...Bf5?? 6.Qe2! which wins a piece due to the pin (if 6...Qe7 7.Nd5, forcing 7...Qd7 because of the threat to the c7-pawn; then 8.d3 wins the piece). Viswanathan Anand resigned after only six moves after falling for this against Alonso Zapata at Biel in 1988.[5]

Cozio Attack: 5.Qe2

edit

White can also force simplification with Lasker's 5.Qe2 Qe7 6.d3 Nf6. This is generally only good enough for a draw, which Black should be satisfied with.

Other lines

edit
  • 5.d3 is the French Attack, a quieter line.
  • 5.c4 is the Kaufmann Attack, also explored by Keres.
  • 5.Bd3 is the Millennium Attack.

3.Nxe5, other lines

edit

These lines are all relatively uncommon today.

Cochrane Gambit: 3...d6 4.Nxf7

edit

This risky line was labelled "speculative but entertaining" by Nick de Firmian[6]. He evaluates the position in Veselin Topalov–Vladimir Kramnik, Linares 1999 as offering chances for both sides after 4...Kxf7 5.Nc3 c5!? 6.Bc4+ Be6 7.Bxe6+ Kxe6 8.d4 Kf7 9.dxc5 Nc6.[7]

Paulsen Variation: 3...d6 4.Nc4

edit

Though this move was labelled "ineffective" by de Firmian, it is occasionally seen at grandmaster level. US master Andrew Karklins has experimented with 4.Nd3!?, now called the Karklins–Martinovsky Variation. This was played in the World Chess Championship 2018 between Magnus Carlsen and Fabiano Caruana.[8]

Damiano Variation: 3...Nxe4

edit

3...Nxe4, the Damiano Variation, has traditionally been regarded as an error, though it has occasionally been seen in recent grandmaster play. Black must play accurately to avoid a serious disadvantage. After 4.Qe2 Black must avoid:

  • 4...Nf6?? 5.Nc6+ winning the queen
  • 4...d5? 5.d3 Qe7 6.dxe4 Qxe5 7.exd5 and Black loses a pawn
  • 4...d6? 5.Nxf7! Kxf7 6.Qxe4 and Black has lost a pawn and the ability to castle

Best is 4...Qe7 5.Qxe4 d6 6.d4 dxe5 7.dxe5 Nc6, and after 8.Nc3 Qxe5 9.Qxe5+ Nxe5 10.Nb5 (or 10.Bf4) White has the advantage.[9][10]

Stafford Gambit: 3...Nc6?!

edit

3... Nc6?!, recently dubbed the Stafford Gambit, is considered dubious, but it sets a number of traps. It was advocated by Eric Rosen in the early 2020s and became popular in online games. After 4.Nxc6 dxc6, White wins a pawn but must play carefully. After 5.e5 (5.d3 is better) Ne4 6.d3?? (White should play 6.Nc3, 6.d4, or 6.Qe2) 6...Bc5! and White resigned in Lowens–Stafford, US correspondence game 1950.[11][12] After 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nc6 4.Nxc6 dxc6 5.d3 Bc5, White must avoid the Légal Trap 6.Bg5?? Nxe4!, and if 7.Bxd8 (relatively best but still losing is 7.Be3) 7...Bxf2+ 8. Ke2 Bg4#. Instead White should play 6.Be2 Bc5 7.c3! with d3–d4 to follow, and Black has insufficient compensation for the pawn, though White must still play carefully.[13]

Other lines

edit
  • 3...Qe7?! is inferior, as 4.d4 d6 5.Nf3 Qxe4+ 6.Be2 gives White a large lead in development.

Steinitz Variation: 3.d4

edit

This move was preferred by Wilhelm Steinitz, the namesake, although it was known earlier. Black can capture either pawn. Also possible is 3...d6, transposing into the Philidor Defence.

3...Nxe4

edit

A long and complicated tactical sequence which has frequently been seen in master games is 3...Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Bd6 6.0-0 0-0 7.c4 Bxe5 8.dxe5 Nc6 9.cxd5 Qxd5 10.Qc2 Nb4 11.Bxe4 Nxc2 12.Bxd5 Bf5 13.g4 Bxg4 14.Be4 Nxa1 15.Bf4 f5 16.Bd5+ Kh8 17.Rc1 c6 18.Bg2 Rfd8 19.Nd2 (diagram) and White has the slightly better endgame after either 19...Rxd2 20.Bxd2 Rd8 21.Bc3 Rd1+ 22.Rxd1 Bxd1 or 19...h6 20.h4.[14][15]

Alternatives to the sequence include 5...Nd7, 5.dxe5, 4...Nc6, 4.dxe5, and 4.Nxe5, which typically transposes to the main line of the Classical Variation.

3...exd4

edit

After 3...exd4, the usual continuation is 4.e5 Ne4 (4...Qe7?! 5.Be2 is better for White) 5.Qxd4 d5 6.exd6 Nxd6, followed by 7.Nc3 Nc6 8.Qf4 or 7.Bd3 Nc6 8.Qf4. After the other capture, 3...Nxe4, 4.Bd3 d5 (4...Nc6!? 5.Bxe4 d5, intending 6.Bd3 e4, is also possible) 5.Nxe5, when either 5...Nd7 or 5...Bd6 gives roughly equal chances.

The alternative 4.Bc4 transposes into the Urusov Gambit.

Other lines

edit
  • 3...d5 usually ends up transposing to one of the above lines.
  • 3...d6 transposes to Philidor's Defence.

Boden–Kieseritzky Gambit: 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.Nc3

edit
abcdefgh
8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Boden–Kieseritzky Gambit: 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.Nc3

3.Bc4 is an occasionally seen alternative for White and almost always intends 3...Nxe4 4.Nc3, the Boden–Kieseritzky Gambit. Black's main alternatives to 3...Nxe4 are 3...Nc6, transposing to the Two Knights Defence, and the aggressive 3...d5.

The gambit is not considered wholly sound, since Black has several viable options. Black can accept the gambit with 4...Nxc3 5.dxc3 f6, but must play carefully after 6.0-0 (for example 6...Bc5?? 7.Nxe5! is disastrous; 6...d6 and 6...Nc6 are good).

Another more aggressive try is 6.Nh4, where White goes for a quick assault on Black's king, but Black can maintain a small advantage if he plays cautiously via 6...g6 7.f4 Qe7 8.f5 Qg7 9.Qg4 Kd8. Another possibility is returning the gambit pawn with 4...Nxc3 5.dxc3 c6 6.Nxe5 d5, which equalises.

A third possibility is transposing to the Italian Four Knights Game with 4...Nc6, and if 5.Nxe4, 5...d5. If 5.Bxf7+?, then 5...Kxf7 6.Nxe4 d5 gives Black the bishop pair and control of the centre. If 5.0-0, Black plays 5...Nxc3 6.dxc3 and now Black can play 6...Qe7!, after which Bobby Fischer wrote that "White has no compensation for the Pawn",[16] or 6...f6 transposing to the main line of the Boden–Kieseritzky. Black also has lines beginning 6...Be7 and 6...h6.

Three Knights Game: 3.Nc3

edit

This leads to the Three Knights Game of Petrov's Defence. It is often played by White in order to avoid lines unique to the Petrov, as 3...Nc6, which transposes to the Four Knights Game, is Black's most common and best regarded response. It can also be reached via 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 (the Vienna Game). The main alternative is 3...Bb4, which remains the Three Knights Game proper.

Closed Variation: 3.d3

edit

White declines to exchange any pieces and instead defends the pawn on e4. Black usually responds with 3...Nc6. White often intends either 4.Be2 or to fianchetto with 4.g3 and 5.Bg2. These lines are also sometimes reached by transposition, and are also the main lines of two rare third moves for White after 2.Nf3 Nc6, 3.g3 (the Konstantinopolsky Opening[17]) and 3.Be2 (the Tayler Opening[18]), which both most often continue 3...Nf6 4.d3.

The symmetrical 3...d6 and aggressive 3...d5, typically continuing with either 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.Nc3 Bb4 6.Bd2 Bxc3 7.Bxc3 Nc6 or with 4.Nbd2, which transposes to the 2.d3 line of Alekhine's Defence, are notable alternatives for Black.

Other lines

edit
  • 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.d3 is an alternative to the Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit for White, often continuing 4...Nf6 5.Nxe5 d5 6.Bb3 Bd6 7.d4 0-0 8.0-0 c5. 4...Nc5 is also possible and often continues 5.Nxe5 d5 6.Bb3 Nxb3 (or 6...Bd6).
  • 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.Nxe5 typically leads to positions similar to the main line Petrov but with White down a tempo after 4...d5 5.Be2 (or other retreats).
  • 4.Qe2 defends the pawn on e4 but blocks the bishop, which is typically instead developed with a later g3 and Bg2.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "Lasker vs. Pillsbury, 1895". Chessgames.com.
  2. ^ *"ECO Code by Chess Informant". www.chessinformant.rs. Chess Informant. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
  3. ^ Janjgava, p. 107
  4. ^ Burgess, Graham (2010), The Mammoth Book of Chess, Running Press
  5. ^ "Alonso Zapata vs. Viswanathan Anand". ChessGames.com. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
  6. ^ Modern Chess Openings (MCO) 14th edition
  7. ^ de Firmian, Nick (1999), Modern Chess Openings (14th ed.), Random House, ISBN 0-8129-3084-3
  8. ^ "Magnus Carlsen vs. Fabiano Caruana, 2018". Chessgames.com.
  9. ^ Janjgava, pp. 108–09
  10. ^ Yusupov, pp. 12, 22–24
  11. ^ "Lowens vs. Stafford, 1950". Chessgames.com.
  12. ^ Forintos & Haag, p. 110
  13. ^ Avetik Grigoryan, Stafford Gambit ― The Refutation, Chessmood, 6 April, 2021
  14. ^ "Position Search after 19.Nd2". Chessgames.com.
  15. ^ de Firmian, Nick (2009), Batsford's Modern Chess Openings, Pavilion Books, p. 136, ISBN 978-1906388294
  16. ^ Bobby Fischer, My 60 Memorable Games, Faber and Faber, 1972, pp. 280–81. ISBN 0-571-09987-4.
  17. ^ Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1992). The Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 206. ISBN 0-19-866164-9.
  18. ^ Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1992). The Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 182. ISBN 0-19-866164-9.

Further reading

edit
edit
 
The Wikibook Chess Opening Theory has a page on the topic of: Petrov's Defence
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petrov%27s_Defence&oldid=1308816875"